JC Footy Genius
Bringer of TRUTH
- Jun 9, 2015
- 10,568
Regardless of the rights or wrongs of Bercow's decision, what conceivable good would giving May another 21 days do? Regardless of one's position: she is a busted flush.
It's clearly the position of the government to put pressure on MP's to say what they are for rather than what they are against. The nearer to the deadline we get the more they need to stop posturing and face up to the choices. No matter the rights and wrong's of this tactic it's not the job of the speaker to help thwart the governments position and go against parliamentary procedure. Also from what I have read both the EU and the UK government who have put much time and effort in obviously want to make the deal work. The EU, in particular, didn't want to make any new conssessions until a vote had taken place. After the inevitable defeat in a first vote the EU and the UK government will need time to work out if saving their deal is possible and if yes then what is needed to make it work. I doubt three days would be enough to come to a new agreement whereas up to 21 days would.
Returning the question .. What conceivable good is getting everyone to vote again after just three days?