Clearly there needs to be a POLE about this and of course to inform our decision about this Young Lady's chances...
Just go with whatever your mind’s eye pictures, but a bit older, a little fatter, and eight times more annoying.
Clearly there needs to be a POLE about this and of course to inform our decision about this Young Lady's chances...
Is your name John? Are you an Albion season ticket? Did you dump a Victoria Malone? Not so much bell cheesery but some of us had to work with her. Was she always a psycho or what on earth did you do?
.........So there he was, having utterly destroyed a brand new toilet and with no means to clean either it or himself. Trying so hard not to laugh, I asked him what on earth he did in this awful situation? Embarrassed, he said that he waddled like John Wayne out to his car and drove to the McDonald's around the corner to clean up. He said he fully intends on blaming the whole thing on one of the contractors working in the building.
You're in danger of opening up old wounds with that tale of befoulment and blame shifting. Your colleague doesn't moonlight as a coach driver by any chance?
OK. I have been having a running battle with colleagues at my uni where 8 of 14 students on one course were called into an interview with an invitation to admit to plagiarism (of face a tribunal). Then the original markers were invited to adjust their marks. Three of the three I have spoken with have said 'fark off, there is no plagiarism'.
So what happened?
We use a sustem called turnitin that identifies shared word strings with material online. If a % is hit (at say 30%) you can use this as a trigger to look at the matches. Usually we find the original source material said 'we examined 250 carrots, 300 beetroot and 740 onions and found legionalla in 25% and pasteurella in 67%' and they student changed it to ''they examined 250 carrots, 300 beetroot and 740 onions and found legionalla in 25% and pasteurella in 67% (source cited)' Not plagiarism. Fact.
So the course organiser should look at this and recognise no plagiarism and off to bed.
Unfortunately my colleague pulled all the 30% students in and read the riot act.
Now apparently a whole lot of angry students have set up a what's app group (or whatever it is called) with a view to doing us down.
My HoD accused me of throwing fuel on the fire by objecting to this cockwomblery. Until I found the 25 pages of regs on plagiarism on the uni web site and pointed out the course organiser should have made a decision before calling the students in....
I don't like to see needless suffering. My own student was ****ed over by this bollocks and is seething.
The equivalent is this. You arrive at the Amex and a police camera has identified red green and gold in your car interior. You are then invided to attend Bow Street Magistrate's court to be interrogated about possible Mary Juhana smoking in your car. You turn up and are invited to singe a confession or have your case transferred to the Old Bailey with a fair chance you'll be stripped of your UK citizenship. This is not satire, it is exactly what happened, in analogy format.
And people wonder why I get angry? FFS.
How much of an issue is this?Turnitin is good for people blatantly cheating but too many variables in it.
Doesn't stop ghost writing though....
How much of an issue is this?
I have been out of the corporate loop for some 8 years following now being self employed/ semi retired but still do some part time word for a large company and received the following email
so that we can add you back onto payroll. Please bring pages 2 & 3 of your P45 in with you or pop into the People and Culture team (previously known as HR)
People & culture team FFS !
I have been out of the corporate loop for some 8 years following now being self employed/ semi retired but still do some part time word for a large company and received the following email
so that we can add you back onto payroll. Please bring pages 2 & 3 of your P45 in with you or pop into the People and Culture team (previously known as HR)
People & culture team FFS !
The HR director has been told to stop asking people to sing & dance after trying to get the Chief Engineer to do so during familiarization training. Chief Engineer has 28 years in the company, eats lead & sh*ts bullets. He was not amused!
I have been out of the corporate loop for some 8 years following now being self employed/ semi retired but still do some part time word for a large company and received the following email
so that we can add you back onto payroll. Please bring pages 2 & 3 of your P45 in with you or pop into the People and Culture team (previously known as HR)
People & culture team FFS !
Timeline of the emperors new clothes:
B.C (before ****s) when businesses just got on with things quite happily. Then this ‘industry’, a bit like bottled water, took hold and everyone forgot you didn’t really need, a fact that’s all but lost to time now.
1990s Personnel
2000s HR
2010s Talent Acquisition (and my favourite, because only a right **** would come up with that term)
2020s ...looks like the latest rebrand is People & Culture!!
The one constant throughout though is they’ve always been a bunch of ****s. No offence to anyone who is mind.
Whatever happened to Personnel Departments?
Just go with whatever your mind’s eye pictures, but a bit older, a little fatter, and eight times more annoying.
Dealing with ‘Human Capital’ as one of my former organisations called us......not for long though.......
I have been out of the corporate loop for some 8 years following now being self employed/ semi retired but still do some part time word for a large company and received the following email
so that we can add you back onto payroll. Please bring pages 2 & 3 of your P45 in with you or pop into the People and Culture team (previously known as HR)
People & culture team FFS !