- Oct 17, 2008
- 15,061
Very few cases get under my skin like this one has. Crimes are gonna happen, “evil” will always exist… but this is next level horrible.
It was the frequency rather than the presentation. Premature babies die, around 3 a year in that hospital. It was the 13 in one month, with the common theme that this nurse was present at all deaths that raised suspicions. An autopsy would have been orded if an individual death had been deemed suspicious.Numerous babies who were seemingly healthy, right up until the moment they rapidly deteriorated, for no apparent reason, surely should be enough to arouse suspicion. It was certainly enough to make the consultants concerned.
Yes, I understand that, but I also think that the frequency alone might have prompted autopsies, to see if there was a common link (medically) as to why so many were dying unexpectedly.It was the frequency rather than the presentation. Premature babies die, around 3 a year in that hospital. It was the 13 in one month, with the common theme that this nurse was present at all deaths that raised suspicions. An autopsy would have been orded if an individual death had been deemed suspicious.
"Emails cease forthwith" is beyond appalling. Whichever jumped-up little twat wrote that needs to be made to explain themselves in a court of law. Good luck with thatHaving read a fair bit on this and watched the Panorama I'm of the opinion that the inquiry should be a statutory one and the executives who tried to shut down the concerns of 7 consultant pediatricians should be summoned, and likely held negligent for the subsequent deaths in the case. "Emails cease forthwith" and "there will be consequences" seems to me to be intimidation with threats of reporting them to the GMC.. There also needs to be a route for concerns to be raised outside of the trust they are acting in... A direct path to the health secretary if needed.
A basic grasp of maths and probability by looking at the inexplicable incidents and staffing sheet should have shut this beast down long long before the police became involved and lives would have been undoubtedly saved. Just shocking
Having read a fair bit on this and watched the Panorama I'm of the opinion that the inquiry should be a statutory one and the executives who tried to shut down the concerns of 7 consultant pediatricians should be summoned, and likely held negligent for the subsequent deaths in the case. "Emails cease forthwith" and "there will be consequences" seems to me to be intimidation with threats of reporting them to the GMC.. There also needs to be a route for concerns to be raised outside of the trust they are acting in... A direct path to the health secretary if needed.
A basic grasp of maths and probability by looking at the inexplicable incidents and staffing sheet should have shut this beast down long long before the police became involved and lives would have been undoubtedly saved. Just shocking
I think autopsies are performed on young people or those that die suddenly, as a matter of course.Numerous babies who were seemingly healthy, right up until the moment they rapidly deteriorated, for no apparent reason, surely should be enough to arouse suspicion. It was certainly enough to make the consultants concerned.
Unfortunately, premature babies are at risk so a death wouldn’t be as much as a sudden occurrence. This was the same situation as Beverly Allitt where lessons were said to have been learnt. Clearly not.I think autopsies are performed on young people or those that die suddenly, as a matter of course.
Given that most of these poor babies were doing well and then suddenly crashed, I would have imagined an autopsy would have been a definite.
I don’t know for sure though. When my brother suddenly died aged 39 I asked the doctor whether an autopsy would be performed and she said that yes it would “because he is so young”.
So I can only think a baby would have autopsy without question?
As I say, I don’t know for sure .
You are right. Sadly when the numpties realized there was an issue the babies had been cremated.Yes, I understand that, but I also think that the frequency alone might have prompted autopsies, to see if there was a common link (medically) as to why so many were dying unexpectedly.
I've just read a few on the news ticker and I'm going to have to go outside for a walk. Certainly not looking at any news for the rest of the day. Just awful.That poor lady outside Manchester Crown Court on BBC News having to relay the Victim Impact Statements live to the viewers deserves some kind of medal for not breaking down on screen
Sincerely hope the sentencing reflects the evil bitch being bad rather than mad. Won't be holding my breath thoWhole life sentence for each murder. Severest sentence possible. Good. Hope she rots in hell.
It does……..Sincerely hope the sentencing reflects the evil bitch being bad rather than mad. Won't be holding my breath tho
Not sure it's actually been announced whether her sentence gets served in a prison or in a secure unit yet. Whole world of difference. Hopefully a whole new world of painIt does……..
All of this.When you read the things she did to each baby....... and then look at smiling photos of her and read her history (nice family background, always wanted to work with babies, studied hard for it, plenty of friends, sociable, pretty in a plain way) you have to wonder what the f*** went wrong in her head. Truly shocking.