Ah - yes, I see.My post was about how the electorate choose to position themselves in the current political set up, and how this hamstrings the chances of a decent government.
Last edited:
Ah - yes, I see.My post was about how the electorate choose to position themselves in the current political set up, and how this hamstrings the chances of a decent government.
Will you defend the previous incumbents then? Or, do you lean a bit further towards Reform?Totally agree and only time will tell. But what Reeves & Co do now will decide where we are in 2029. Ask anyone on business or who understands very basic economics, who thinks that we have a chance in hell of delivering what the gov hope to by then.
Simply astounding that anyone here can defend this government.
pPerhaps many of us believe that the current lot, although far from perfect, represent a massive improvement over the last 14 shambolic years and, given our political system is a two horse race, that is the best offer we have at the moment.
Will you defend the previous incumbents then? Or, do you lean a bit further towards Reform?
There is a difference between refusal to change working practices and refusal of modernisation.Seriously? The never never ending southern rail strike was about the unions refusing to change working practices!
there's often not really a difference, modernisation requires changes to work practice. the guards is an excellent example, the role simply wasn't required anymore as technology renders some of their role redundant. there's still a person on the train - dont recall being on one without despite all the fear they'd be cut - they do a different job.There is a difference between refusal to change working practices and refusal of modernisation.
What southern did to their network with removal of guards and not investing in next generation of drivers will come to be seen as some of the most cavalier, destructive aspects of rail management.
You must get different trains than me..just in the last month I have had 3 trains delayed due to an issue (alarms, passenger disruption etc) which a guard could have assisted.there's often not really a difference, modernisation requires changes to work practice. the guards is an excellent example, the role simply wasn't required anymore as technology renders some of their role redundant. there's still a person on the train - dont recall being on one without despite all the fear they'd be cut - they do a different job.
On Thursday I traveled up to Leeds to see my daughter with an overnight stay in the rather wonderful Queens Hotel.You must get different trains than me..just in the last month I have had 3 trains delayed due to an issue (alarms, passenger disruption etc) which a guard could have assisted.
Revenue protection are nigh on invisible on major commuting trains.
We should also ask British transport police view of there being no second person on the trains and the increased demand on them
The cost of a guard is minimal in terms of a cost of a ticket
You're spot on. There are inconsistency of approach. Azuma trains can be driver only operation. But they have guaranteed other staff on the train whether its buffet , train manager or revenue protection. You can modernise a railway to not need a guard and have better trains with air con. But doing away with security is a change of working practice.On Thursday I traveled up to Leeds to see my daughter with an overnight stay in the rather wonderful Queens Hotel.
Apart from trips to London on Southern/Thameslink and East m/West Coast way on Southern Thursday was my first time on what I would call a long distance service out of London since 1992 and boy was i impressed with the whole LNER setup from Kings X, i really enjoyed my trip there and back from Kings X, even yesterday with my original train being cancelled.
What a difference between the companies.
100%I think @HillBarnTillIDie is referring to something that was reported in the Daily Mail 5 months ago on the day of the stabbings that he has only just heard about. Nothing to do with his more recent visits
There is a difference between refusal to change working practices and refusal of modernisation.
What southern did to their network with removal of guards and not investing in next generation of drivers will come to be seen as some of the most cavalier, destructive aspects of rail management.
Yep there was at least 4 members of staff not including driver yesterday, it almost felt like a plane journey.You're spot on. There are inconsistency of approach. Azuma trains can be driver only operation. But they have guaranteed other staff on the train whether its buffet , train manager or revenue protection. You can modernise a railway to not need a guard and have better trains with air con. But doing away with security is a change of working practice.
Train companies overall have reduced their investment in training new drivers. It's easier to increase wages to attract from other companies. Now I know that they still need to learn routes and be partnered for many weeks but that is a significant investment and there isn't as much of it happening now to attract new start from fresh drivers to replace those who are leaving. Hence why needing overtime to run a basic service.Genuine question, could you explain the not investing in the next gen of train drivers part please?
The clown car is now polling 22%. They are killing the chances of a decent Labour government ever again in this country
Try Avanti!!!On Thursday I traveled up to Leeds to see my daughter with an overnight stay in the rather wonderful Queens Hotel.
Apart from trips to London on Southern/Thameslink and East m/West Coast way on Southern Thursday was my first time on what I would call a long distance service out of London since 1992 and boy was i impressed with the whole LNER setup from Kings X, i really enjoyed my trip there and back from Kings X, even yesterday with my original train being cancelled.
What a difference between the companies.
I will, what routes do the operateTry Avanti!!!
Those poor mortgage lenders, doubtless all on course to make massive losses this year and fighting to stay afloat…Mortgage rates continue to go up after that shocker of a budget. The days of under 4% appear to have gone, they were about 3.70% fixed for 5 years, 69% ltv October 2024, all long gone