£60 a year to read Naylor, a local hack who couldn't string a sentence together if his life depended on it. No thanks
He should write a article with random words in capital letters and try to make it funny.
£60 a year to read Naylor, a local hack who couldn't string a sentence together if his life depended on it. No thanks
All about his love for Hughton?three decent Naylor articles up so far today
Just did the same!Had to block AN on twitter as being spammed constantly with adverts for his new employer.
Andy still posts a lot of Albion stuff on Twatter, so will be a tight arse and stick to that.
He should write a article with random words in capital letters and try to make it funny.
We get the Sunday Times too, but have a subscription deal at a tenner a month that means we get vouchers to pick up the paper at our local newsagent, and a digital Times subscription to read it online. Works for us
If they can regularly produce work like the exceptional feature on how transfers really happen, I might have to can my scepticism and stay on board. At the annual price of £60 though. There’s no way I’d be paying £10 per month.
The problem for Andy is that he was reliant on his collaboration with the club to deliver stories. He still has these connections, but is he prepared to write challenging stories which the club might not like, or will he straddle the middle road. If he does the former he might make a more interesting read and have some sort of unique insight, but he may also make the club unhappy and lose his connections / edge. The Argus sport essentially survives by providing free PR for the club. It's a sad truth about the industry.
.
Being tight, in spirit I’m against paying for stuff I can get elsewhere for free. However, having just signed up for the trial, it feels like they might be on to something.
Albion-wise, Andy’s written an interesting piece that gives a good insight into Potter. However, for me, the real appeal may actually be reading stories from other clubs, written by people who know what they’re talking about. The national press don’t dip much beyond the Big Six and, when they do, routinely make ill-informed generalisations.
Sure, the local papers will still provide a service but their sites have become bloated with advertising and pop-ups. On first impression, The Athletic seems more akin to browsing a magazine, but one that’s far more up to date than the likes of 442. It’s clear the writers have more time to craft their articles than they’d ever get up against newspaper deadlines.
If they can regularly produce work like the exceptional feature on how transfers really happen, I might have to can my scepticism and stay on board. At the annual price of £60 though. There’s no way I’d be paying £10 per month.
"30-day free trial (ending 09/04/2019)"
They do, of course, mean 04/09...