Dick Knights Mumm
Take me Home Falmer Road
You've experienced the Met too then?
boom - tish.
You've experienced the Met too then?
boom - tish.
hard to compare what IS is doing with regard to all their beheadings and Saudi capital punishment though
Mustafa. Are you for real. So it is America and the UK's fault that a small percentage of Muslims think it is ok to behave like medieval barbarians. Don't be silly.
egg fookin' zactly ....avenge the crusades is what it's all about to the "charismatic mullahs" who are brainwashing these people , and i use the term brainwashing as , and i ask you , what on earth , in the 21st century , could make a person believe that they need to commit murder to gain approval of their god and gain entry to their version of heaven...?? W.T.F.F...!!!
What we found out was tosh was that the WMDs ever existed. We also found out that our governments were too keen to believe the inside information that said they existed. But they did believe they existed.
ISIS , acting as proper muslims are instructed to .
Quran 9:5
"Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful."
I thought that last week I read that the SAS had the details of the executioner and were going to 'take him out' and operate a rescue mission for the brits, what happened there?
Your credibility has gone out of the window. You know he used chemical weapons to kill thousands of innocent people don't you?I don't know what the answer is, we have created an atrocious mess there. Helping Assad restore peace would be a start though.
If we decide to bomb Iraq yet again - this problem will never end. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
It is now time for positive action by the West on a very large scale. It seems that there are only 30,000 of the jihadists so it should be possible to wipe out most of them with a barrage of well targetted air strikes. The time for pussy footing around has ended. It's time the scum-bags of IS were put in their place.
It's not 'just as likely', that's a lazy analysis. But even if there were 'only' a 50% chance that he did, that's low enough to give him military backing is it?It's a possibility that he used chemical weapons, but there is no solid evidence of that, the state denied it, it is just as likely the chemical weapons were used by the Syrian rebels - but that's a different debate.
The point is that the IS has hugely benefited from the Syrian civil war & Western support of the rebels. Peace in Syria would be a huge step towards defeating them, so supporting Assad to return peace to Syria should be a priority (but it won't be)
What we found out was tosh was that the WMDs ever existed. We also found out that our governments were too keen to believe the inside information that said they existed. But they did believe they existed.
Iraq didn't let the UN inspect their nuclear research, and it wasn't clear what Iraq were and were not capable of. Western leaders were concerned about Iraq's weapons and also wanted to remove Saddam from power for other reasons. Iraq insiders provided 'proof' that they were developing WMDs, and IMO that was enough for Bush and Blair, whereas I believe they should have investigated the claims a lot more thoroughly, and found that they were completely false, by Iraqis that also wanted to remove Saddam. But it's my opinion that Bush and Blair believed (because they wanted to) the claims were true.Have to say that it isn't quite clear what you are saying?
It's a possibility that he used chemical weapons, but there is no solid evidence of that, the state denied it, it is just as likely the chemical weapons were used by the Syrian rebels - but that's a different debate.
The point is that the IS has hugely benefited from the Syrian civil war & Western support of the rebels. Peace in Syria would be a huge step towards defeating them, so supporting Assad to return peace to Syria should be a priority (but it won't be)
Iraq didn't let the UN inspect their nuclear research, and it wasn't clear what Iraq were and were not capable of. Western leaders were concerned about Iraq's weapons and also wanted to remove Saddam from power for other reasons. Iraq insiders provided 'proof' that they were developing WMDs, and IMO that was enough for Bush and Blair, whereas I believe they should have investigated the claims a lot more thoroughly, and found that they were completely false, by Iraqis that also wanted to remove Saddam. But it's my opinion that Bush and Blair believed (because they wanted to) the claims were true.
Did he? I dont think it was ever proved who used those weapons. Out of interest why are you so sure he did?Your credibility has gone out of the window. You know he used chemical weapons to kill thousands of innocent people don't you?
One minute it's all our fault for intervening, the next you're saying we should intervene to assist a war criminal!
You know he used chemical weapons to kill thousands of innocent people don't you?
!