A British Aid Worker Beheaded by ISIS

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

1945 Japan?

Got any figures on how many of the poor buggers on the receiving end deserved to be vaporised?

 

[Guinness Boy]

The plain fact that the videos are only released by and through the SITE group should set the alarm bells ringing.

Something on the bigger picture from the Global Research website

http://www.globalresearch.ca/going-a...-state/5401439

'Needless to say, US, NATO, Saudi and Qatari support and funding to the Islamic State will continue. The objective is not to destroy the Islamic State as promised by Obama. What we are dealing with is a US sponsored process of destabilizing and destroying both Iraq and Syria. The campaign against the Islamic State is being used as a justification to bomb both countries, largely targeting civilians.

The endgame is to destabilize Iraq as a nation state and trigger its partition into three separate entities.

The broader US-NATO strategic objective is to destabilize the entire Middle East- North Africa -Central Asia -South Asia region, including Iran, Pakistan and India.'

It's copied from the website I put on that same post.

So as usual just blindly copied and pasted without any thought going in to it whatsoever. Why would the U.S. want to destabilise IRAQ? They already did so once. Then they spent years stabilising it again.

 

[Soulman]

It's copied from the website I put on that same post.

Well perhaps check before you copy and paste. Iran will supposedly support action against ISIS. So if that part of the "copied from the website" is wrong, then maybe the rest is fantasy as well.

 

[wellquickwoody]

That nuclear bomb didn't stop anything if we are soon to be in WW3. A Nuclear war will be a global disaster, not a helpful solution.

You really are off your rocker if you think that you can link the ending of WW2 with a highly improbable imminent starting of WW3.

 

[wellquickwoody]

Got any figures on how many of the poor buggers on the receiving end deserved to be vaporised?

None of them DESERVED it, but it stopped the war saving an unknown number of further casualties.

War is not fair, and the Islamic State have declared war upon us. Alternatively we could ask them for a piece of paper?

 

[Soulman]

So as usual just blindly copied and pasted without any thought going in to it whatsoever. Why would the U.S. want to destabilise IRAQ? They already did so once. Then they spent years stabilising it again.

Don't forget The Truth's copied and pasted "The broader US-NATO strategic objective is to destabilize the entire Middle East- North Africa -Central Asia -South Asia region, including IRAN, Pakistan and India.' as well.
Iran are backing the attack on ISIS.......good accurate link/website that one

 

[The Truth]

So as usual just blindly copied and pasted without any thought going in to it whatsoever. Why would the U.S. want to destabilise IRAQ? They already did so once. Then they spent years stabilising it again.

Can you show me the statistics to prove the U.S. have stabilise Iraq?

 

[The Truth]

The plain fact that the videos are only released by and through the SITE group should set the alarm bells ringing.

Something on the bigger picture from the Global Research website

http://www.globalresearch.ca/going-a...-state/5401439

'Needless to say, US, NATO, Saudi and Qatari support and funding to the Islamic State will continue. The objective is not to destroy the Islamic State as promised by Obama. What we are dealing with is a US sponsored process of destabilizing and destroying both Iraq and Syria. The campaign against the Islamic State is being used as a justification to bomb both countries, largely targeting civilians.

The endgame is to destabilize Iraq as a nation state and trigger its partition into three separate entities.

The broader US-NATO strategic objective is to destabilize the entire Middle East- North Africa -Central Asia -South Asia region, including Iran, Pakistan and India.'

How this post has confused people is beyond me.

Can you not see the inverted commas?

 

[Soulman]

You really are off your rocker if you think that you can link the ending of WW2 with a highly improbable imminent starting of WW3.

Well it was only 70 years ago ....

 

[Soulman]

How this post has confused people is beyond me.

Nobody is confused, it is factually wrong and has been ripped to pieces bit by bit.

 

[The Truth]

You really are off your rocker if you think that you can link the ending of WW2 with a highly improbable imminent starting of WW3.

Well it was only 70 years ago.

What school year are you in?

 

[wellquickwoody]

What school year are you in?

Now it is possible that I really am the dumbest person on NSC when it comes to history, but unless you point out why that is the case I reserve the right to think of you as a 'conspiracy nut job'.

 

[hitony]

Now it is possible that I really am the dumbest person on NSC when it comes to history, but unless you point out why that is the case I reserve the right to think of you as a 'conspiracy nut job'.

Ohh she will react heavily to that comment......

 

[The Truth]

Ohh she will react heavily to that comment......

Why are you referring to me as a she?

I'm a man.

Not back to your old habits already are you? A massive shame if so.

 

[The Truth]

Now it is possible that I really am the dumbest person on NSC when it comes to history, but unless you point out why that is the case I reserve the right to think of you as a 'conspiracy nut job'.

Year 3?

 

[Guinness Boy]

Can you show me the statistics to prove the U.S. have stabilise Iraq?

That's not the point you halfwit. If the U.S. didn't stabilize it then they wouldn't need to be involved in its further destabilization. If they did they'd hardly be surreptitiously undoing their good work

 

[The Truth]

That's not the point you halfwit. If the U.S. didn't stabilize it then they wouldn't need to be involved in its further destabilization. If they did they'd hardly be surreptitiously undoing their good work

Again, where is your evidence to back this shit up?

Why is everything you say, all from the top of your head? Never anything to back up what you say, just some strange way of viewing peace?

 

[Soulman]

What school year are you in?

Oh, i see you added me (after editing) in your school boy joke. Sorry if your scanning of the internet for another conspiracy theory brought up this one.
Best check the content before hastily posting.
By the way i did well in History at school, but did not have to be an historian to spot the gaffs in the link that you put up.
Teachers report for you. "Lack of concentration and Walter Mitty tendencies, must try harder".

 

[hitony]

Waaaay, you're back!

Missed you loads.

Why are you referring to me as a she?

I'm a man.

Not back to your old habits already are you? A massive shame if so.

I'm pleased you missed me, I am referring to you as she as I believe you to be a "she" and I don't have any habits, well non that would ever affect you dahling xx

 

[wellquickwoody]

Year 3?

Still a nut job.