Can some some of the drum bangers for these clowns explain to me how the proposals to allow people to sign away their employment rights in return for tax free shares in their companies will help anyone singularly and the country as a whole please?
Thank you
Ah well.
When you get elected you simply say 'I was going to do what I said, but the mess left by the previous (insert name of party) government means that Im now going to do what I wanted to do, but didnt want to put in my speeches and manifesto, because if I did no one would have voted for me'.
But like I say; its party conference season and its the opposition you can say what you like and it doesnt matter.
Apparently some people have previously gone mad and said things like; 'we wont charge students for going to University', and even put it in a manifesto! They didnt have to say how...
Last time they couldnt beat a Labour party that featured Brown AND Balls.
Yet you are hopeful that after 5 years of 'government' they will beat a Labour Party with just Balls?
I admire your optimism.
And Chris Pattens isnt?
5 years as govenor of Hong Kong?! What a piece of piss! Then 4 years 'milking the EU cash cow'.
Again whatever your 'political persuasion'?
He would have done it for the love of the job and paid his own expenses obviously. As would Chris Patten fresh from the ever so tough role of being governor of Hong Kong. Must have cost him a fortune to get back on the Queens boat thing as well.
I thought wed all agreed it was Gordan Browns fault (the global economy, the double dip recession, the failure to win a eurovision for yonks etc)? Now youre saying it was not only Neil Kinncoks fault but his wifes as well?!
Any other advances on the Kinnocks? Michael Foot maybe? What about...