Search results

You are right about the dossier of lies there was no need for that as the government of this country would have been expected to go to war in Iraq as part of the 'special relationship'. And it would have done whoever it was. It would appear that it is you who is maybe trying to have it both...

Yes. Every little pratfall - stuck on that zipwire, mobile going off on HIGNFY - all stage managed and scripted. Im actually intrigued by what would happen if he did become P.M.

1) Whatever party was in power at the time would have taken us into that war as we have to kowtow to the Americans. Its up there with going to war in the Falklands in order to win a general election IMO. 2) The global financial meltdown led us into the deepest recession for 70 years. Only one...

Nice bloke. Met him last year in Bristol at breakfast in a hotel where we both staying. Obviously didnt let on that I knew who he was and he was a genuine bloke. Didnt smell of fish or seals or anything.

He signed for Peterbrough in 1996 and that was the last I remember.

He may be in a better position to judge but that doesnt make him a better judge as these appointments show. You are correct about Tony Blair also, but as the old saying goes two wrongs dont make a right. You mention two examples of people who shouldnt have been in the cabinet in 10 years as...

I know that there is a Whitehawk in Brighton if that helps?

The one with the guitar solos on it.

On the undercard of Ricky Hattons comeback fight. ?

Brough Scott was mega! Looked like he was in his 40s, but was in fact about 70!

Obviously. Thats why he didnt know who Oaksey was because Oaksey was on the telly INSIDE the house!

Does anyone out there know a good gardener that they could recommend? You do dont you?

Its alright. Im old enough!

I dont know I no longer work in that field. i was merely informing you that they have targets after you had stated quite categorically that they wouldnt. You seem to have moved off of the cabinet reshuffle topic and moved into other areas. Nevermind I suppose thats all part and parcel of a debate.

Yes you have and I have met you. Once for about 10 minutes. I would not claim to KNOW you though, nor what motivates you, nor what you think, nor what you feel. Because I dont.

The bit where you said: That says it all, I live in the real world and know plenty of these cases in my own extended family, you, and people like you , do the jobs you do because there is no pressure , no target , no PROFIT to make? That indicated to me that according to you all of those...

You say 'you and people like you' as if you know me. You dont.

Do all jobs have to make a profit for them to be worthwhile?

Well done. Again. Each investigator has targets for the amount of prosecutions that they are expected to acheive and the amount of savings they are expected to acheive. Sorry to disappoint you.

At leats we havent had to wait that long for the systemic problems' that this government has created in not just the economy, but every other area of politics that they touch, to be exposed. It happens daily.