So the example I gave in my post of taking pictures in a park which might accidentally include an upskirt image should also be punishable by up to 2 years imprisonment, (the proposed penalty in the Bill). That’s the sort of situation that could potentially arise when legislation is passed...
The article linked to appears to suggest that such an action is already illegal
She started the campaign to change the law after two men took a picture up her skirt while she was at a concert in London's Hyde Park last July.
Police said they were unable to prosecute as the picture was not...
Probably not
“Most police forces no longer attend reports of routine shop theft and will only send an officer to investigate if thieves have mad threats of violence against staff.”
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/brit-businesses-complain-shoplifting-epidemic-11756332
Of course our income is more than a £100m higher than last season but as I said earlier I wouldn’t think TB will be looking to put another £30m into the club as he did last year and when the higher costs connected with being in the PL are taken into account there will be substantially less than...
Not sure there’ll be an additional £100m - the club made a loss of nearly £39m last year - can’t see TB accepting a similar loss this year - take into account the higher wage bill this year and the capital costs incurred pre-season with the lights, press box etc. And there won’t be a whole lot left.
It was the Independent Regulatory Commission that made the decision and it only had a choice of two verdicts regarding the FA charge of Rodriguez - proven or not proven. There was no option of “not guilty”. They weren’t judging an individual but the charge made by the FA against one of them.
How does that work when at Purfleet you can see tankers from different companies and supermarkets all in the same queue?
In any case how would it be possible as the outlet pipe from the tanks is at the bottom?
Indeed - compare though the 2016 statistics which show there were 32 fatal accidents where the driver was using a mobile phone and the more than 3,000 fatalities in accidents where speed was a factor.
Thankfully drinking and driving has become socially unacceptable and the number of deaths where drink was a factor has fallen over the years.
Speeding however is still very much the norm and anyone convicted of speeding is both unlikely to lose their licence nor be condemned by other drivers...
Unless I’ve missed it no one has mentioned the point raised by the panel. The phrase, “you’re black and you stink” is not what you’d normally expect from an English speaker, the word ‘black’ would normally be used as an adjective when being offensive. E.g. “You black . . . . . ‘.
I don’t disagree with you, as far as it goes.
Was forcing people to get on trains they didn’t want to get on “restoring order”?
Was route marching large numbers past hostile fans “restoring order”?
Was forcing individuals without tickets to go to the stadium “restoring order?
When individuals...