Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Pedro's "challenge" on Walton

What was Pedro's challenge on Walton?


  • Total voters
    468
  • This poll will close: .










GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,844
Gloucester
Yellow - I think he was trying to stop, the way his hands were out it looked as if he was trying to protect himself. Not intentional*, so not a red.

* although of course we have no inside knowledge of hat his brain was thinking, it's just the impression I got.
 


Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
26,655
Red I'm afraid. But the ref chickened out by giving a yellow thus putting the onus on VAR, who just agreed with the on pitch decision.
Challenge like that on the Albion keeper we would be screaming for a red.
Yes, I wonder what the poll would have looked like if that was a challenge on our keeper by Delap...

The more I view it, the more it's a red. VAR would not have overturned it. Pedro doesn't clash with Walton he leaps into him and strikes his head with his upper arm. He didn't have to jump at him, even if he couldn't stop.

Suggestions that it is yellow are self defeating. If it is a foul, how is leaping into a player and striking his head not dangerous play ?
 




Guy Fawkes

The voice of treason
Sep 29, 2007
8,334
I wonder what those who said no foul/yellow would have said if Delap had done that on Bart.....
I would have thought yellow at most in that instance too, as both players were committed to try to get to the ball first, the forward was entitled to go for it, and a collision was probably inevitable as a result.
 


Justice

Dangerous Idiot
Jun 21, 2012
21,505
Born In Shoreham
Funny old world I’ve seen posters say they want to sign Delap to rough up the opposition, Pedro does exactly that and apparently deserves red cards 🙄
They can hardly give that as a red when keepers have actively wiped out players over the last couple of seasons and got away with it.
 


Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
26,655
I said on the match thread, it's bizarre that in football that's open to interpretation, yet rugby, which is clearly more physical, would see Pedro sent off.
He makes contact with Walton's head, with his shoulder. That should be a red all day long. I'm amazed with all the concussion rules brought in, they haven't done the same as rugby, with the shoulder to head challenge.
That's a good point. In Rugby that's a sending off. Leading with the shoulder.
 




Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
26,655
Meh. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. :thumbsup:


Schumaker should have been in prison for that. He didn't even get a yellow !
 


studio150

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 30, 2011
30,419
On the Border
What is Pedro supposed to do, when going for the ball at full speed.

Usually when chasing down an under hit back pass, the keeper goes to ground to get the ball, and the forward jumps over the keeper on the ground. But in this instance Walton decides to kick the ball rather than going to ground to gather the ball, so Pedro can do very little to avoid the contact.

Not a red card for me.
 






Arthritic Toe

Well-known member
Nov 25, 2005
2,507
Swindon
I think giving him a V sign just before the collision is a step too far:

1737116005688.png
 


Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
38,090
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
That's exactly what I immediately thought - Is there foul play? Yes. Is there contact with the head? Yes. Any mitigation? No. There are some things rugby does well, this is one of them. Pedro could have done so much more to be less dangerous but he was entirely reckless and cowardly.
So if you're saying he was reckless that's a yellow......
 


Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
26,655
So if you're saying he was reckless that's a yellow......
Yeah, that's pretty much my point. If it is a foul then jumping into a keeper with your feet raised and a leading shoulder is pretty reckless.

Irony that he would have gone in Rugby for that. I'm just hoping that was a spare decision of fortune we had in the bank, available to spend.
 








Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
12,727
That's a good point. In Rugby that's a sending off. Leading with the shoulder.
Sure - but maybe that's because they are completely different sports, played by players with completely different physiques, using different parts of their bodies to compete for the ball.
 


Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
12,727
Yeah, that's pretty much my point. If it is a foul then jumping into a keeper with your feet raised and a leading shoulder is pretty reckless.

Irony that he would have gone in Rugby for that. I'm just hoping that was a spare decision of fortune we had in the bank, available to spend.
leading with his shoulder?
or turning, trying to stop himself, after sprinting for 20 yards?
 




Braggfan

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded
May 12, 2014
2,020
Sure - but maybe that's because they are completely different sports, played by players with completely different physiques, using different parts of their bodies to compete for the ball.
Yeah but one of those sports is rougher and allows much more physical contact and that sport would have sent Pedro off for dangerous play.
 


dejavuatbtn

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2010
7,671
Henfield
Dangerous at least, or reckless. Hit the goalie with his shoulder at some speed And I’m not convinced he thought he was going to get the ball. Not pleasant and not the sort of challenge I’d be happy about if it was one of ours.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here