It's good, it will save a lot of expense at the Hague.Ukrainians do seem to know where the war criminals are, don't they?
It's good, it will save a lot of expense at the Hague.Ukrainians do seem to know where the war criminals are, don't they?
Get your heads round this. What an insane, f***ed up country. You need to read it all.
It's difficult to process. OK, they made a tragic mistake and fired a missile at a civilian plane. Mistakes happen in war.Shocking stuff... Russia attempted to cover it up (no surprise in a way).
Better to just land at the nearest Russian airport (ignore their refusals) and tell them all passengers are live streaming it.
Awful.
Meanwhile, Spanish coastguard rescues Russian seamen in the MedIt's difficult to process. OK, they made a tragic mistake and fired a missile at a civilian plane. Mistakes happen in war.
But to then try to cover it up, knowing you are intentionally sending a plane load of innocent civilians to their death, is off the scale.
They have no regard for the sanctity of human life.
Surely. Surely, the peace talks can now go only one way.
Who are all indirectly helping the Russian war effort.Meanwhile, Spanish coastguard rescues Russian seamen in the Med
Until Putin is not in charge?How many times can Russia shoot down airliners and get away with it ?!
A bit more than just fascinating. West needs to wake up & stop being so cowardly expecting others to suffer the pain. Governments dithering/procrastinating over increasing defence spending, maybe Trumps 5% a bit OTT but we & the rest should have started upping our game in Feb 22. The Baltics & Poland did but not the rest of us.With this, the sabotage of the Estlink2 cables and NATO ‘sources’ claiming Russia are running simulation exercises for a full scale attack on Finland it’s fascinating to see what happens to Russia in 2025
Hang on a minute. You advise others to dial back, but then, you turn your own dial up to 11 !People stating that the Russians 'made a mistake' shooting the plane down might want to dial back on that a bit until more is known. Theres a very good chance that there were people on that flight the Russians wanted dead or as they would say, 'killed in a tragic air crash' . It was after all a flight to Chechnya so that could be significant. This has all the hallmarks of a deliberate attack by Russia and that would be my view until proven otherwise.
Another is that Russia launched the missile, and then realised it was a civilian plane, and shot the missile down when it was close to the plane, hence the shrapnel damage to the fuselage.
That would make the most sense; Anti-aircraft missiles are designed to detonate at the front of the aircraft and pretty much shred the cockpit/controls. The fact that the pilots seemed to have some control (although sadly not enough) suggests the missile didn't detonate where it should.Another one going round, is that it was intended, after the plane tried to land in Grozny three times. Another is that Russia launched the missile, and then realised it was a civilian plane, and shot the missile down when it was close to the plane, hence the shrapnel damage to the fuselage.
Ground controlled missiles have an "abort" function whereby the crew can detonate it before it hits the target.Blimey, how much alcohol does one need to go with that mad theory?
The first missile would be going at the speed of, well, a missile. How many seconds before they changed their minds? Then how many minutes before they found a missile capable of shooting down one of their own missile, that happens to be in the right location? I'm not even sure that such a missile exists (stopping a missile that's flying away, as opposed to inbound). And if one did exist, and they did find one and quickly make the decision to fire it, how on earth is it going to catch up the first one?
That is a lot of alcohol.
Ground controlled missiles have an "abort" function whereby the crew can detonate it before it hits the target.
I read a tweet or a reply to something, ostensibly from someone who claimed to be a pilot, which said that planes give out a signal, identifying themselves as military or civilian. So, if a missile was launched at the plane, the Russian who was operating the anti-aircraft system, whether on the vodka or not, either didn't see the signal, or ignored it.Ground controlled missiles have an "abort" function whereby the crew can detonate it before it hits the target.