Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Russia invades Ukraine (24/02/2022)











Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
7,490
Shocking stuff... Russia attempted to cover it up (no surprise in a way).
Better to just land at the nearest Russian airport (ignore their refusals) and tell them all passengers are live streaming it.
Awful.
It's difficult to process. OK, they made a tragic mistake and fired a missile at a civilian plane. Mistakes happen in war.

But to then try to cover it up, knowing you are intentionally sending a plane load of innocent civilians to their death, is off the scale.

They have no regard for the sanctity of human life.

Surely. Surely, the peace talks can now go only one way.
 






raymondo

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2017
7,677
Wiltshire
It's difficult to process. OK, they made a tragic mistake and fired a missile at a civilian plane. Mistakes happen in war.

But to then try to cover it up, knowing you are intentionally sending a plane load of innocent civilians to their death, is off the scale.

They have no regard for the sanctity of human life.

Surely. Surely, the peace talks can now go only one way.
Meanwhile, Spanish coastguard rescues Russian seamen in the Med 🤷🏼‍♂️
 


Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
7,490
Meanwhile, Spanish coastguard rescues Russian seamen in the Med 🤷🏼‍♂️
Who are all indirectly helping the Russian war effort.

It is right that the west shows the barbarians the way to behave. 'For those in peril on the sea' still applies, even to Russians.

Even though Russia turns it on its head, and deliberately imperils a plane load of foreigners to the sea, to save its embarrassment.
 














Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,837
GOSBTS
With this, the sabotage of the Estlink2 cables and NATO ‘sources’ claiming Russia are running simulation exercises for a full scale attack on Finland it’s fascinating to see what happens to Russia in 2025
 


The Fifth Column

Lazy mug
Nov 30, 2010
4,143
Hangleton
People stating that the Russians 'made a mistake' shooting the plane down might want to dial back on that a bit until more is known. Theres a very good chance that there were people on that flight the Russians wanted dead or as they would say, 'killed in a tragic air crash' . It was after all a flight to Chechnya so that could be significant. This has all the hallmarks of a deliberate attack by Russia and that would be my view until proven otherwise.
 


fly high

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
1,795
in a house
With this, the sabotage of the Estlink2 cables and NATO ‘sources’ claiming Russia are running simulation exercises for a full scale attack on Finland it’s fascinating to see what happens to Russia in 2025
A bit more than just fascinating. West needs to wake up & stop being so cowardly expecting others to suffer the pain. Governments dithering/procrastinating over increasing defence spending, maybe Trumps 5% a bit OTT but we & the rest should have started upping our game in Feb 22. The Baltics & Poland did but not the rest of us.
 




Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
7,490
People stating that the Russians 'made a mistake' shooting the plane down might want to dial back on that a bit until more is known. Theres a very good chance that there were people on that flight the Russians wanted dead or as they would say, 'killed in a tragic air crash' . It was after all a flight to Chechnya so that could be significant. This has all the hallmarks of a deliberate attack by Russia and that would be my view until proven otherwise.
Hang on a minute. You advise others to dial back, but then, you turn your own dial up to 11 !

There are a number of theories going round. An intentional mass murder, but targeting one or a handful of people by Russia, is just one of them. Not sure that anyone has said there is 'a very good chance' of this though? I'm not saying they aren't capable of it of course.

Another one going round, is that it was intended, after the plane tried to land in Grozny three times. Another is that Russia launched the missile, and then realised it was a civilian plane, and shot the missile down when it was close to the plane, hence the shrapnel damage to the fuselage.

Unsurprisingly, an early version of events (a flock of birds) has been withdrawn by Russian media...

But the incriminating evidence is building, not least from the survivors. According to the Youtuber, Konstantin Samoilov, Russia has been excluded from the investigation by Kazakhstan, so we should get the full, clear version at some point. I'm hoping it will stay in the news for a long, long time.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,645
Goldstone
Another is that Russia launched the missile, and then realised it was a civilian plane, and shot the missile down when it was close to the plane, hence the shrapnel damage to the fuselage.

Blimey, how much alcohol does one need to go with that mad theory?

The first missile would be going at the speed of, well, a missile. How many seconds before they changed their minds? Then how many minutes before they found a missile capable of shooting down one of their own missile, that happens to be in the right location? I'm not even sure that such a missile exists (stopping a missile that's flying away, as opposed to inbound). And if one did exist, and they did find one and quickly make the decision to fire it, how on earth is it going to catch up the first one?

That is a lot of alcohol.
 


happypig

Staring at the rude boys
May 23, 2009
8,229
Eastbourne
Another one going round, is that it was intended, after the plane tried to land in Grozny three times. Another is that Russia launched the missile, and then realised it was a civilian plane, and shot the missile down when it was close to the plane, hence the shrapnel damage to the fuselage.
That would make the most sense; Anti-aircraft missiles are designed to detonate at the front of the aircraft and pretty much shred the cockpit/controls. The fact that the pilots seemed to have some control (although sadly not enough) suggests the missile didn't detonate where it should.
 


happypig

Staring at the rude boys
May 23, 2009
8,229
Eastbourne
Blimey, how much alcohol does one need to go with that mad theory?

The first missile would be going at the speed of, well, a missile. How many seconds before they changed their minds? Then how many minutes before they found a missile capable of shooting down one of their own missile, that happens to be in the right location? I'm not even sure that such a missile exists (stopping a missile that's flying away, as opposed to inbound). And if one did exist, and they did find one and quickly make the decision to fire it, how on earth is it going to catch up the first one?

That is a lot of alcohol.
Ground controlled missiles have an "abort" function whereby the crew can detonate it before it hits the target.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,645
Goldstone
Ground controlled missiles have an "abort" function whereby the crew can detonate it before it hits the target.

Yes, and that would be a different theory to the one I was debunking. Ain't no way they shot the missile down with another missile.
 


Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
7,490
Ground controlled missiles have an "abort" function whereby the crew can detonate it before it hits the target.
I read a tweet or a reply to something, ostensibly from someone who claimed to be a pilot, which said that planes give out a signal, identifying themselves as military or civilian. So, if a missile was launched at the plane, the Russian who was operating the anti-aircraft system, whether on the vodka or not, either didn't see the signal, or ignored it.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here