Might as well just set up an auto bounce for this every November. He'll never change and neither will anyone offended by it. It's the ultimate stalemate.
Yes, you could ponce a free one, but would you make a contribution to the Royal British Legion to help those that have served and suffered for our country?I don’t think I’ve ever worn a poppy.
If I could ponce a free one maybe ?
I agree with your first point.Yes...and thread topics develop. Personally, I've no problem with Mclean not wearing a poppy. I note his morals are strangely reconciled with disliking what the British represent so much that he has to turn his back on the flag/anthem yet he's happy living here and earning lots of money. A cynic might point to the money being a huge factor and just for today I'll be that cynic.
I do however have greater issues with being told that I should no longer regard the people who blew up 4 year olds in shopping centres and nurses at Remembrance Parades as evil *******s. It's great that there is a sort of peace in Ulster and if the power-sharing is the heavy price to be paid then so be it but my utter contempt for those that murdered innocent people doesn't diminish just because of the longevity. Given that the PSNI has very recently admitted that the IRA still exists and that it's heavily implicated in the fatal shooting of someone this year then it would seem that they haven't gone away, haven't stopped killing people nor handed over all their arms. So I'm going to keep on thinking they are murderous scum.
I do every year. Just never wear a poppy.Yes, you could ponce a free one, but would you make a contribution to the Royal British Legion to help those that have served and suffered for our country?
Either that or start a new one.Indeed, like bouncing 9 year old threads to stir the story up again.
"I may not like what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"Either that or start a new one.
We've had a 9 second 'minutes' silence at Kilmarnock courtesy of the 'great and the good' of Glasgow Celtic and he's behaved like that on the day we remember the fallen, as someone who had grandparents and great grandparents who fought in both wars I find his 'stance', now stretching over a decade, extremely disrespectful.
Clearly you don't old boy, so on this matter we will have to agree to differ.
Precisely, nothing wrong with what he says here (even though I disagree yada yada etc)
I think it's sad that some folk seemed so wrapped up in all this and somehow diverge from it's point. If he was condemning remembrance that would be another matter, but he so clearly isn't.
I must confess that I have changed my take over the years and proudly wear my (BHA) poppy these days.I think it's sad that some folk seemed so wrapped up in all this and somehow diverge from it's point. If he was condemning remembrance that would be another matter, but he so clearly isn't.
Most of us will have a relation, near or distant, who was a war victim. I think mine are all First World War, although some served in the second. Remembrance is about their willingness to serve and pay the ultimate price. I feel that right. But sometimes I wonder of its function. It feels like more than that these days. There is something that feels political about it and has been alluded to in the above message. And I find myself once thinking of solemn reflection as a rightful thing and now almost seeing it as being weaponised, and it makes me uncomfortable. Not least for the memories of those poor souls. The introduction of Armed Forces Day was more to do with supporting conflicts and deployment, there is also the condemnation of white poppies as a symbol of peace (what purpose did folk die for if it wasn't for a lasting peace ?).
Wearing a poppy is meaningless if it involves a kind of appropriated honour that connects us to those who lost their lives and somehow makes us equally worthy. And those are the people who attack James Mclean. Our duty to their memory is to work for peace and reconciliation. Otherwise their deaths will have accomplished nothing. And that is far more insulting than not wearing a poppy will ever be.
James Mclean isn't the problem, those who attack him are.
I understand what you say from the point that an act of remembrance is of no value without a duty to the memory of the fallen. I know that you recognise that and therefore your wearing of the poppy is naturally a wholesome act. This is probably the case with most folk who do as well.I must confess that I have changed my take over the years and proudly wear my (BHA) poppy these days.
And UK society has changed, largely driven by the TV, with presenters once wearing a poppy only on remembrance day itself, and not all of them, to it becoming compulsory on every live programme starting weeks before remembrance day.
And I am OK with that. It is clearly presented as remembrance for all those who fell in WWI and all conflicts afterwards. If some public-facing people need reminding, so it goes. It has a pro-peace message.
Maybe it means something different to others.
Overall I am comfortable with it and regard it as an excellent show of respect for the dead. Something that was widely and flippantly mocked in the 60s and 70s when I grew up, by the nation at large. Albeit, and I wouldn't know, perhaps 'out there' it still is. I appreciate I live in a bubble.
As for the Irishman, I have no problem with him and his stance. I may have done in the past, but . . . . things and people change. Thankfully.
Indeed.I understand what you say from the point that an act of remembrance is of no value without a duty to the memory of the fallen. I know that you recognise that and therefore your wearing of the poppy is naturally a wholesome act. This is probably the case with most folk who do as well.
This time of year makes me reflective about the values of a society rather than nationhood itself. As much as it indeed was, I equally think, for example, of World War II as as the death of millions of people in terrible circumstance as much as an Allied victory . When I think of the Falklands Conflict, the original subject here, I think as much of the Argentine conscripts who were sent to their deaths in front of a highly trained Western army. I think that perspective makes me feel more challenged. It makes me ask 'Why ?' for humankind. It also make me think of how the brave forces are subject to the political whims of old men in suits.
I think poppies are a fantastic symbol of reflection, and an avenue to a wider perspective of human conflict. What better way to serve a memory than by creating a better world. If there is an afterlife we could better look those who passed in the eyes.
I think I've put that right.
Sorry for bouncing but I felt regardless of his missal on social media, and there are clearly two versions of Bloody Sunday, and almost certainly a bit closer to the truth in the middle, he was in the wrong standing away from his colleagues, in hindsight waiting in the tunnel and then entering the pitch in the ref’s whistle would have preserved his beliefs and not flagged up the whole situation again for the umpteenth year.Indeed.
And the pernicious reasons for the creation of this thread remain, with the OP eventually shown the door for borderline emotional self-harm. Oh, and abuse.
Some of the early posts that invent an imaginary cohort of self-loathing haters of all 'things' British, hell-bent on preventing people showing respect for the dead, are embarrassing to read.
I wish the thread hadn't been bounced and would hope it might be closed off now by a moderator.
Maybe, if you imagine that none of the cameras and none of the spectators would have been looking for him or reacted once he jogged onto the pitch. Oh, hang on....Sorry for bouncing but I felt regardless of his missal on social media, and there are clearly two versions of Bloody Sunday, and almost certainly a bit closer to the truth in the middle, he was in the wrong standing away from his colleagues, in hindsight waiting in the tunnel and then entering the pitch in the ref’s whistle would have preserved his beliefs and not flagged up the whole situation again for the umpteenth year.
If only people that screamed at him had as much reason in their point.
Not much point in starting a debate with Buzzer, he left NSC years ago. Someone I rarely agreed with on politics at least, but always carefully read his arguments. He always held his own in that regard.I agree with your first point.
The second is a bit more tricky as it's not the same IRA you referenced in your quote. Since the Good Friday Agreement, there's been a number of spin-offs including RIRA and now the New IRA etc. and none of them involve the same people or resemble the original IRA.