Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

[News] Chris Kaba .. Justice served ?



jcdenton08

jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
15,023
Randy McNob said:
Nailed it....

Isaiah Nature, 52, questioned why lethal force was necessary. “Even though [Chris Kaba] was known as a violent man, if this is my job, I’ve got to look at the situation. I could shoot him in the leg, you could reach for the gun,” he said. But while Isaiah was insistent that the shooting “wasn’t justified”, he added: “The police officer is doing his job – you obey the law. The police officers know him as a gunman and a troublemaker – [If I’m a police officer] I’ve got to make sure I’m safe. They were both wrong – there’s no right.”

Meanwhile, race relations activist Lee Jasper, a former policing director for London, called for juries in such cases to hear expert evidence on institutional racism.
“If the rationale is a police officer only needs a reasonable belief to fire his weapon, then it’s tantamount to a licence to kill,” he said. “This verdict will make it absolutely clear to Black communities that when it comes to the Met police, Black lives don’t matter.”

www.theguardian.com

‘Shocking’: Chris Kaba verdict stokes old frustrations in Brixton

Latest acquittal of an officer who shot dead unarmed Black man provokes disbelief, frustration and resignation in south London
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...
Randy McNob said:
Precisely, so what was the thought process as to whether to fire or not? The jury concluded they didn't feel the officer's life was at risk, there's only one conclusion: race
Click to expand...

Da Man Clay said:
Sorry, what? The jury didn’t conclude anything apart from him being not guilty of murder.
Click to expand...

wellquickwoody said:
Does a jury offer a conclusion, or just a verdict?
Click to expand...

jcdenton08 said:
What is your source for this?
Click to expand...

LamieRobertson said:
Can you share the source for this re the jury
Click to expand...

Triggaaar said:
Could you post a link to that conclusion please?
Click to expand...

jcdenton08 said:
Where did they conclude this please? Could you provide a source?
Click to expand...

Can you provide a source for saying “The jury concluded they didn't feel the officer's life was at risk”?
 








M

METALMICKY

Well-known member
Jan 30, 2004
6,940
Harry Wilson's tackle said:
That's the law. Verdicts based on evidence, not offender profiling.

That's right and proper. And the laws were changed because people were routinely convicted in the past based on 'previous', and the previous was sometimes itself false.

Verdicts based on things other than evidence is called prejudice.
Click to expand...
I'm actually astonished that someone didn't understand that principle that you've explained well.
 


A

A mex eyecan

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2011
3,971
Randy McNob said:
Nailed it....

Isaiah Nature, 52, questioned why lethal force was necessary. “Even though [Chris Kaba] was known as a violent man, if this is my job, I’ve got to look at the situation. I could shoot him in the leg, you could reach for the gun,” he said. But while Isaiah was insistent that the shooting “wasn’t justified”, he added: “The police officer is doing his job – you obey the law. The police officers know him as a gunman and a troublemaker – [If I’m a police officer] I’ve got to make sure I’m safe. They were both wrong – there’s no right.”

Meanwhile, race relations activist Lee Jasper, a former policing director for London, called for juries in such cases to hear expert evidence on institutional racism.
“If the rationale is a police officer only needs a reasonable belief to fire his weapon, then it’s tantamount to a licence to kill,” he said. “This verdict will make it absolutely clear to Black communities that when it comes to the Met police, Black lives don’t matter.”

www.theguardian.com

‘Shocking’: Chris Kaba verdict stokes old frustrations in Brixton

Latest acquittal of an officer who shot dead unarmed Black man provokes disbelief, frustration and resignation in south London
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...
so tell me. You are the policeman with the gun. You and your colleagues lives are in danger of being killed by someone refusing repeatedly to get out of their car. Revving its engine. Clearly demonstrating that they will stop at nothing to get away. You are already aware said driver is linked to 2 shootings in recent days. You have a split second to decide what to do.….. What is it you choose?
 






jcdenton08

jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
15,023
GT49er said:
To be fair (reluctantly) The Guardian is also reporting a lot of garbage!
Click to expand...
I always point this out whenever people are (rightly) slating the Daily Fail. The Grauniad go absolutely batshit with these types of stories, because they think it’s what the readership wants. Most Grauniad readers I know find it a bit embarrassing.
 


Stumpy Tim

Stumpy Tim

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
14,181
Back in Brighton. Well Hove actually
Harry Wilson's tackle said:
If such information were pivotal.....it would be a tough call. I agree.

I think I'd prefer it to have someone found not guilty, based on evidence, rather than found guilty based on no evidence but consideration of 'previous'.

Consider Winston Silcott. He had previous when he was convicted of murder (PC Blakelock).

"In March 1987, three local men, Winston Silcott, Engin Raghip and Mark Braithwaite, were convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, despite no witnesses and no forensic evidence. The Tottenham Three are Innocent Campaign and the Broadwater Farm Defence Campaign pressed for a retrial. On 25 November 1991, all three defendants were cleared by the Court of Appeal when an ESDA test demonstrated police notes of interrogations (the only evidence) had been tampered with."

It turns out a previous murder conviction was also suspect.

He was certainly a wrong 'un, but . . . . because of the fitting up and the disclosure of previous convictions it is pretty much impossible to determine how much of a wrong 'un.

That's not good for the justice system.
Click to expand...
The difference in this case is his previous history is being used to defend someone, not prosecute. But it’s a tough one… the justice system isn’t perfect and never will be. There are pros and cons to everything
 




Iggle Piggle

Iggle Piggle

Well-known member
Sep 3, 2010
6,039
If only we'd sent Blake on a D&I course, he could have spoken to Chris about his feelings and everything would have been OK.

On a more serious note, it's taken 2 years to get to this point with murder charges hanging over Blake, his identity made public - having shot a prolific gang member - and still has a threat of Gross misconduct from his employers I wonder who on earth would be an armed policeman?

When you look at the evidence, Kaba had shot someone 2 days previously, might have had a gun on him and was driving his car at speed using it as a weapon it's got to be pretty hard for it not to end up court if you pull the trigger. It doesn't feel like that makes Britain a safer place to me.
 


S

Shaktarman

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2022
457
A mex eyecan said:
so tell me. You are the policeman with the gun. You and your colleagues lives are in danger of being killed by someone refusing repeatedly to get out of their car. Revving its engine. Clearly demonstrating that they will stop at nothing to get away. You are already aware said driver is linked to 2 shootings in recent days. You have a split second to decide what to do.….. What is it you choose?
Click to expand...
Check their skin colour, religion and ‘pronouns’ first then decide?
 






Easy 10

Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,465
Location Location
A mex eyecan said:
so tell me. You are the policeman with the gun. You and your colleagues lives are in danger of being killed by someone refusing repeatedly to get out of their car. Revving its engine. Clearly demonstrating that they will stop at nothing to get away. You are already aware said driver is linked to 2 shootings in recent days. You have a split second to decide what to do.….. What is it you choose?
Click to expand...
Point of order - the police were NOT aware that the driver was linked with 2 shootings. The car had been tagged as having been in the vicinity of a shooting incident (hence it being pulled over), but Kaba was not the owner of the car, and at the time of the shooting, they didn't know who he was.
 


jcdenton08

jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
15,023
Easy 10 said:
Point of order - the police were NOT aware that the driver was linked with 2 shootings. The car had been tagged as having been involved, but Kaba was not the owner of the car, and at the time of the shooting, they didn't know who he was.
Click to expand...
Had he complied calmly, like most innocent people would do, and you know, not attempt to run over the policemen, he would be alive now. And facing serious charges for attempted murder.
 








oneillco

oneillco

Well-known member
Feb 13, 2013
1,336
jcdenton08 said:
I always point this out whenever people are (rightly) slating the Daily Fail. The Grauniad go absolutely batshit with these types of stories, because they think it’s what the readership wants. Most Grauniad readers I know find it a bit embarrassing.
Click to expand...
Headline in today's Guardian: "Chris Kaba shot man in club and was alleged core member of London gang"

How do you want them to report it?
 








Easy 10

Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,465
Location Location
jcdenton08 said:
Had he complied calmly, like most innocent people would do, and you know, not attempt to run over the policemen, he would be alive now. And facing serious charges for attempted murder.
Click to expand...
Absolutely. But he wasn't an innocent person, he was a total wrong-un, a feral ratboy, so acted according to type. And paid the ultimate price.

I'm just genuinely glad it didn't end up ruining the life of the firearms officer. Imagine having this hanging over you for the last 2 years.
 


D

Da Man Clay

T'Blades
Dec 16, 2004
16,287
Easy 10 said:
Point of order - the police were NOT aware that the driver was linked with 2 shootings. The car had been tagged as having been in the vicinity of a shooting incident (hence it being pulled over), but Kaba was not the owner of the car, and at the time of the shooting, they didn't know who he was.
Click to expand...

And this is the reason his previous convictions were not allowed to be referenced - because it is irrelevant to the reason he was shot. Allowing it to be used would cloud the decision making for the jury.

If the police had know who he was the time of the shooting and this happened during an operation to arrest him for example it likely would have been included - as that information would have reasonably been factored in (however briefly) before the officer took the shot.
 


You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top
Link Here