Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Third Investec Ashes Test, England v Australia, Old Trafford 1-5 Aug 2013













Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,321
Hove
The immovable objects Cook and Trott have become.....

erm....distinctly moveable.


How the hell are we 2 up in this series!?
 














Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,321
Hove
I still don't understand why, if the ball is going to hit the stumps, It's given Not Out.

LBW is always a hypothetical, Hawkeye is an enhanced prediction but a prediction nonetheless, and the ICC don't want to take out the role of the umpire completely, so their judgement is still key.

Although given the umpiring in this match, their judgement has been simply poor.
 






Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,739
West Sussex
Blimey... Siddle gets the edge from Root... and a sitter is dropped by Clarke at 2nd slip. :eek:

England are really under pressure here...
 










You have to factor in that Hawkeye is not 100% accurate. So if the umpire gave it not out, that decision should stand. If the Umpire had given that out and England had reviewed it, it would have been given out.

OK, thanks. One more question though.

Do they lose a review even if it finds in their favour or is it Tennis style?
 








Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,321
Hove
**** me.

****ity **** sticks **** off ****ing joke ****ing umpiring theyre ****ing clueless ****ing **** sticks.

He's not ****ing hit that.
 


Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,739
West Sussex
OK, thanks. One more question though.

Do they lose a review even if it finds in their favour or is it Tennis style?

No - if the review is correct, then they don't lose one of their two.

It's not going to matter for England now, as both have been used... and failed.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here