Perhaps you could post them up again, i can't find the bits that apply to this particular thread....thanks
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
The establishment and historic child sex abuse
- Thread starter Pinkie Brown
- Start date
Perhaps you could post them up again, i can't find the bits that apply to this particular thread....thanks
Crispy Ambulance
Well-known member
You could be right about IH because the public only see the jokey quips on HIGNFY. However, the work that he and many others have done in Private Eye over the years, would ensure that no stone would be left unturned if he had a significant role in any enquiry. You're right about Cameron's missed opportunity - suspect this is all about him being seen to be doing something whilst someone's pulling the strings behind the scenes.
martyn20
Unwell but still smiling
I am not a mod, ask them. I just wanted to make sure this thread does not get closed down but hey you just go on posting what the hell you want, you just keep ****ing it up for everyone!
sydney
tinky ****in winky
i will not be contributing to this thread any more....for a number of reasons....;-(
Dorset Seagull
Once Dolphin, Now Seagull
Perhaps if people could stick to the topic instead of fighting over the semantics of rules then this may again become an interesting and informative debate
spring hall convert
Well-known member
I for one would absolutely love him to be involved.
Ok sorry, but you posted quote:"You are breaking the forum rules"......so i obviously thought that you were well versed on them.
As iv'e stated a few times since, i will be careful what i post, that was a couple of pages ago, but you keep recycling the " I just wanted to make sure this thread does not get closed down" line.....wev'e moved on.
Just to say that what normally happens is that if a poster is upset with a certain post, then he messages a Mod/Admin to complain/report a post, and they make a decision......not put in bold letters ON the board "the post must be removed".....like YOU do.
Last edited:
Anyway, after Lady Butler Sloss was involved in previous cases, i'm not sure she is the right person to sort out this new case.
I can't put my finger on it, but there is something about her that does not sit well....imo
They are hidden at the bottom of the page, under the cryptic link 'forum rules'.
dingodan
New member
- Feb 16, 2011
- 10,080
They are still trying to keep things as they want them, but I don't see how they can keep this up, given the circumstances.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28274882
"But the Home Office said it was backing her "unreservedly", adding that she was "beyond reproach"."
Wasn't this able to happen because certain people were considered "beyond reproach"? Isn't that the whole point? Have they not learned anything?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28274882
"But the Home Office said it was backing her "unreservedly", adding that she was "beyond reproach"."
Wasn't this able to happen because certain people were considered "beyond reproach"? Isn't that the whole point? Have they not learned anything?
Thanks Hans........So
"All messages express the views of the author, and neither the owners of North Stand Chat, nor vBulletin Solutions, Inc. (developers of vBulletin) will be held responsible for the content of any message.
By agreeing to these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-oriented, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws.
I don't think they have learned anything......or maybe they don't want to.
Quote from Forum rules.
""All messages express the views of the author, and neither the owners of North Stand Chat, nor vBulletin Solutions, Inc. (developers of vBulletin) will be held responsible for the content of any message."
So your view, and the abuse from Mod Hitony about the board being closed down seem to be a tad off piste eh.
martyn20
Unwell but still smiling
Ok just post what you like, you will not hear another word from me on this particular subject, it's all yours
spring hall convert
Well-known member
Quite.
Great, hopefully we can get back to debating the thread without you disrupting it by asking for "posts to be removed" and quoting phoney board rules etc.
Had I known at the time I made my post explaining why I didn't think it was libellous that the individual concerned had threatened to sue for linking their name with the establishment in question, no doubt I'd have made a similar call to HiTony. I didn't
martyn20
Unwell but still smiling
Had I known at the time I made my post explaining why I didn't think it was libellous that the individual concerned had threatened to sue for linking their name with the establishment in question, no doubt I'd have made a similar call to HiTony. I didn't
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...claims-says-Tory-grandee-Peter-Bottomley.html
Discodoktor
Active member
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-camerons-historic-sex-abuse-3846678?
I'm pleased some of the mainstream media are now discussing the need to investigate former prime ministers.
That the cover ups can in some cases be worse than the original crimes.
That we should protect the victims and not the institutions. And appoint the right people to run them as well as the country.
I'm not in agreement with the emergency law that will allow the security service to spy on our online activity. If I trusted them I might feel different.
But hey let's start with honesty and prosecution no more announcements after they are dead. Let's open this up and not just for the victims but for the future.
I'm pleased some of the mainstream media are now discussing the need to investigate former prime ministers.
That the cover ups can in some cases be worse than the original crimes.
That we should protect the victims and not the institutions. And appoint the right people to run them as well as the country.
I'm not in agreement with the emergency law that will allow the security service to spy on our online activity. If I trusted them I might feel different.
But hey let's start with honesty and prosecution no more announcements after they are dead. Let's open this up and not just for the victims but for the future.