Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

So Crewe are the WORST team in the league ?







Tony Meolas Loan Spell

Slut Faced Whores
Jul 15, 2004
18,069
Vamanos Pest
With the SQUAD that we have we should be in Plymouths position. We are not because we have a twat of a manager. Plain and simple. I bet if Pulis was in charge (for instance) we wouldnt be where we are now we'd be "comfortable"

I know wages, stadium, facilities :bla: :bla: :bla:
 
Last edited:


Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Tony Meolas Loan Spell said:
With the SQUAD that we have we should be in Plymouths position. We are not because we have a twat of a manager. Plain and simple. I bet if Pulis was in charge (for instance) we wouldnt be where we are now we'd be "comfortable"

I know wages, stadium, facilities :bla: :bla: :bla:

If we had our own ground, hadn't had to sell our best players to pay the bills and we had average crowds twice as big as we get at the moment we'd be on a par with Plymouth. So I'd be interested to know how you arrived at the conclusion that we should be in Plymouth's position.

I know sack the Lardy Jocko Clown, not good enough :bla: :bla: :bla:
 
Last edited:


Sid James

New member
Nov 14, 2005
501
Tony Meolas Loan Spell said:
With the SQUAD that we have we should be in Plymouths position. We are not because we have a twat of a manager. Plain and simple. I bet if Pulis was in charge (for instance) we wouldnt be where we are now we'd be "comfortable"

I know wages, stadium, facilities :bla: :bla: :bla:


The twat you refer to has had 2 successful seasons as manager of our club. As a result he has earnt the right to endevour to keep us in this league again this season. Until he has 'failed', which can only be judged over the WHOLE season then your rant ( it hardly qualifies as an argument does it :nono: ) holds no water.

I know can't coach, falls out with players, clueless :bla: :bla: :bla:
 


bhaexpress

New member
Jul 7, 2003
27,627
Kent
Ernest said:
Better get it on now Frank as it's obvious we won't win tomorrow :angry: :angry: :angry:

Same old story Ern and I'm pst caring now anyway. It's the same thing every week and the same people say the same things. Hope you have a good trip anyway.
 




Tony Meolas Loan Spell

Slut Faced Whores
Jul 15, 2004
18,069
Vamanos Pest
Icy Gull said:
If we had our own ground, hadn't had to sell our best players to pay the bills and we had average crowds twice as big as we get at the moment we'd be on a par with Plymouth. So I'd be interested to know how you arrived at the conclusion that we should be in Plymouth's position.

I know sack the Lardy Jocko Clown, not good enough :bla: :bla: :bla:


Nope Rotherham established themselves for about 3 seasons before they went down. Crewe also did before their narrow escape last year and this year they look like probably going down. Similar crowds, similarly skint etc.

We should have been doing the same and we haven't.

As I said before the SQUAD is good enough to be comfortable but the manager doesnt have a clue as witnessed by his velvet bag selection policy.
 
Last edited:


Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Tony Meolas Loan Spell said:
Nope Rotherham established themselves for about 3 seasons before they went down. Crewe also did before their narrow escape last year and this year they look like probably going down. Similar crowds, similarly skint etc.

We should have been doing the same and we haven't.

As I said before the SQUAD is good enough to be comfortable but the manager doesnt have a clue as witnessed by his velvet bag selection policy.

Weren't you talking about being as good as Plymouth half an hour ago? Now you are comparing us to Rotherham and Crewe which is closer to the truth but Crewe have been relegated the same number of times as us in the last 3 years and Rotherham are on the verge of folding. What happened to the Plymouth argument ????
 


Drumstick

NORTHSTANDER
Jul 19, 2003
6,958
Peacehaven
Rougvie said:
Absolutely BEN, maybe I should go back to doing loads of drugs, the highs and lows, didn't seem to be as bad as the high of being in the minibus for 4 hours with your mates and the low of coming back after watching 2 hours of dross mastermined by someone with all the tactical skills of a roadkilled hedgehog, who then blames everyone but himself.

I remeber him coming out on scr a few times and saying it was his fault, tactics or whatever.
 




Rougvie

Rising Damp
Aug 29, 2003
5,131
Hove, f***ing ACTUALLY.
Placcy's gone a bit quiet.
 


the full harris said:
How tedious can one man be? Going back through various threads to piece together a pathetic argument over what someone else does or doesn't think? Does it really matter that much? You need a new hobby, LI.

If it didn't matter that much, why are you bothering to post that it doesn't matter, juvenile hypocrite?

How tedious can all the people be who start boring threads attacking McGhee all the time? Very! And just how tedious is you NSP cliquers always climbing into each other's arse when ever one of you has a disagreement with a third party? Aren't one of you big enough to fight your own battles without getting little friends to hold your hands? :lolol:
 
Last edited:


Rougvie

Rising Damp
Aug 29, 2003
5,131
Hove, f***ing ACTUALLY.
London Irish said:
How tedious can all the people who start boring threads attacking McGhee all the time? Very!

If we had won more than 6 out of the last 46, and never been at the races against teams not that much better than us every few weeks we wouldnt have to attack him would we ??

FREEDOM OF SPEECH as you lefties love to bang on about.

Its tedious that you continue to defend someone sucking us into football oblivion, but please continue your inane attacks on anyone daring to question him, its rather amusing watching the pathetic downfall of someone people used to take seriously.

:)
 
Last edited:




Tony Meolas Loan Spell

Slut Faced Whores
Jul 15, 2004
18,069
Vamanos Pest
Icy Gull said:
Weren't you talking about being as good as Plymouth half an hour ago? Now you are comparing us to Rotherham and Crewe which is closer to the truth but Crewe have been relegated the same number of times as us in the last 3 years and Rotherham are on the verge of folding. What happened to the Plymouth argument ????

If we had a decent manager we would be where Plymouth are in the league at the moment. PLAYER for PLAYER I dont see our SQUAD being any worse than theirs.

There is no shame in using Crewe and Rotherham as the yardstick to show that you can consolidate (albeit in the lower part) in the league for two or three seasons on 'limited' resources.

By then (if all goes to plan) we would have had Falmer and a new chapter.
 


Rougvie

Rising Damp
Aug 29, 2003
5,131
Hove, f***ing ACTUALLY.
:wave:
 
Last edited:


Tony Meolas Loan Spell

Slut Faced Whores
Jul 15, 2004
18,069
Vamanos Pest
Drumstick said:
I remeber him coming out on scr a few times and saying it was his fault, tactics or whatever.


Yes but according to the great one Magoo is blameless even when he says he got it wrong!!!
 




the full harris

New member
Feb 14, 2004
3,212
London Irish said:
If it didn't matter that much, why are you bothering to post that it doesn't matter, juvenile hypocrite?

How tedious can all the people be who start boring threads attacking McGhee all the time? Very! And just how tedious is you NSP cliquers always climbing into each other's arse when ever one of you has a disagreement with a third party? Aren't one of you big enough to fight your own battles without getting little friends to hold your hands? :lolol:


You really do take this internet message board business a little too seriously don't you matey. It's quite sad really.
 


Rougvie said:
If we had won more than 6 out of the last 46, and never been at the races against teams not that much better than us every few weeks we wouldnt have to attack him would we ??

FREEDOM OF SPEECH as you lefties love to bang on about.

Its tedious that you continue to defend someone sucking us into football oblivion, but please continue your inane attacks on anyone daring to question him, its rather amusing watching rather pathetic downfall of someone people used to take seriously.

:)
Inane attacks? From the person who specialises in such debating skill as "f***ing prick"? :lolol:

Sorry you got so angry about your different views being pointed out to you, but I'm glad you've calmed down now.
 
Last edited:


Tony Meolas Loan Spell

Slut Faced Whores
Jul 15, 2004
18,069
Vamanos Pest
London Irish said:
And just how tedious is you NSP cliquers always climbing into each other's arse when ever one of you has a disagreement with a third party?


Sorry LI but on NSP Football talk is banned as you well know. Climbing into peoples arses tho...im sure there is a poll on it somewhere
 


the full harris said:
You really do take this internet message board business a little too seriously don't you matey. It's quite sad really.

Another remarkably quick response from someone who obviously doesn't take the messageboard that seriously at all :)

Ah, the sweet smell of hypocrisy :wave:
 




Rougvie

Rising Damp
Aug 29, 2003
5,131
Hove, f***ing ACTUALLY.
London Irish said:
Inane attacks? From the person who specialises in such debating skill as "f***ing pricks"? :lolol:

Sorry you got so angry about your different views being pointed out with you, but I'm glad you've calmed down now.

Not as angry as you get with the growing percentage not happy that we have a manager who lurches from one defeat till the next eh ? :)

There isn't a day goes by without you venting your spleen on someone daring to disagree with you, in fact its so enjoyable watching you squirm I hope they make it an Olympic sport in 2012, thats if you are still supporting the Albion then???
 


chip

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
1,129
Glorious Goodwood
London Irish said:
Ah, the sweet smell of hypocrisy :wave:

Just in case you need reminding

http://www.hardcoretruth.com/Hypocrisy/

hypocrite:

1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.

2. a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here