turienzo's lovechild
New member
- Oct 25, 2003
- 23,964
- Thread starter
- #81
john's an england man- i wonder if i can catch him?!
12 goals from 126 games for a "striker" is appaling. Dont think he will ever fulfil his potential here. A move will be good for him come the end of the year, can't see him doing enough to get another contract here.
What's that you're looking at, Thomas? Oh yeah, it's the MASTERPLAN
It was the word HOOLIGANS that threw me. I don't even know what I thought it was, but it never crossed my mind that was it.
Anyway, Thomas, what have you GOT to do (at the right time)?
oooh, you've got up on your high horse haven't you. Waving smilie, very damning.
I don't recall saying or giving the impression my opinion was more valid than anyone else's, I was pointing out to you there are different views from people 1. people that don't rate him therefore criticise and others who think he's a good player and that was it. And it irritates me when people think because he's had one good game (in a long, very long time) he's proved people wrong. I can only speak for myself when I say, he can score on the first game of the season, he can do a few step-overs, he can have the most fantastic game of his career, but I will continue to think that he is shit. ...(And you may continue to think what you like about him too)
Don't use the 'it's an opinion forum' one, it's old and boring.
Yes old boring and TRUE!
And fancey judging people on smilies - you're a wind up merchant
I'm sorry but that really is cobblers.
Robinson is NOT a natural goalscorer. He doesn't find the space that his pace should really enable, he just doesn't have the instinct in front of goal, and frankly he's a bit of a bottler when it comes to going in for the ball. Through ball and an onrushing keeper ? Robinson will practically turn and run towards the corner flag rather than risk getting clattered. This is patently NOT a goalscorer, as his stats prove beyond doubt. If you're wanting goals, this fella is not your man.
The only role I can see for him is an an impact sub on the right wing, against tiring legs. He is quite direct and will run at defenders at pace. He has the ability to "get round the back", and if he improves on his delivery, then he could be an asset as a bit-part player from the bench.
But as a striker ? Forget it.
Yes, absolutely.
My point was, your attack on what I said was ridiculous. You had a go at people for holding high standards for him and giving him stick, I only pointed out that the people that have these high standards are different from the ones that didn't rate him in the first place. It did not warrant you telling me I was arrogant etc... It also was slightly strange that you told me it was an opinion forum (that I'm well aware of) I have no problem with people expressing their view but what you said was having a go at people, and that's different.
The point i was making Easy was that 5 years ago he had an unbelievable record of goalscoring in the reserves and youth so obviously was a natural finisher... I doubt you saw any of his reserve games and are just judging him on 1st team games - i know he's not proved himself at this level yet but what i meant was he obviously does have an eye for goal in there somewhere - agreed?!
I think whatever level you play at you are either a natural finisher / goal scorer naturally. I personally think no manager has given Jake a long enough run in the team to prove himself...
It was like 40 goals for the ressies i think...
The point i was making Easy was that 5 years ago he had an unbelievable record of goalscoring in the reserves and youth so obviously was a natural finisher... I doubt you saw any of his reserve games and are just judging him on 1st team games - i know he's not proved himself at this level yet but what i meant was he obviously does have an eye for goal in there somewhere - agreed?!
I think whatever level you play at you are either a natural finisher / goal scorer naturally. I personally think no manager has given Jake a long enough run in the team to prove himself...
It was like 40 goals for the ressies i think...
its always good to have an eye for a goal. Unfortunately thats often not enough, it needs to be coupled with good movement, good positioning, as well as atleast one other thing, such as pace, strength, arial ability etc.
scoring that level of goals at that level shows that he does have the natural ability to score goals, but the fact that he has yet to show little else in terms of 'good striker attributes' indicates that he MAY never make it as a striker
the likes of mcphee, ramsay and gatting have all scored for fun at youth/reserve level but have struggled at senior level
i agree with badger here, i think he could be a very good 'in the hole' type player, or even on the wing in a front 3 (i dont think he has the defensive attributes to be a right midfielder)
Well, we've had a plethora of strikers over the years who can regularly bang them in against all the crocks, kids and trialists you get at reserve team level. Unfortunately, as we've seen with the likes of McPhee, Gatting, Elder et-al, it provides NO worthwhile barometer as to how they'll fare in the first team - the jump-up in class is HUGE, and Robinson isn't the first (and won't be the last) to find its too much of a leap for him.
Like Gatting and McPhee, Robinson will NEVER make it as a striker in the Football League. He is best putting his primary asset (pace) to use down the wings, because he can't score for toffee.