Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

Lewes District Council accept Falmer decision - official







pornomagboy

pornomagboy

wake me up before you gogo who needs potter when
May 16, 2006
6,082
peacehaven




The Large One

The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
pornomagboy said:
http://www.falmer.org.uk/

quiet a funny web page
Click to expand...

"The government have now given the go ahead to the stadium at Falmer, on the same regeneration grounds as last time. The public inquiry system seems to be rigged in favour of the Secretary of State, who can not only make or change the rules, but can it seems choose and change inspectors. We are now waiting for legal advice to see if there are grounds for a challenge in the High Court."

:thud:

:tosser: :tosser: :tosser:
 


The Large One

The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
The Re-Generation Report by Martin Crookston...

------=_NextPart_01C76EFD.0FCF3ED0
Content-Location: file:///C:/A4EB5E4E/MartinCrookston.htm
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml"
xmlns:eek:=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:eek:ffice"
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:word"
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>
<meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii">
<meta name=3DProgId content=3DWord.Document>
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11">
<meta name=3DOriginator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11">
<link rel=3DFile-List href=3D"MartinCrookston_files/filelist.xml">
<title>DRAFT PROOF #1</title>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o: DocumentProperties>
<o:Author> </o:Author>
<o:Template>Normal</o:Template>
<o:LastAuthor>BARNES</o:LastAuthor>
<o:Revision>2</o:Revision>
<o:TotalTime>1</o:TotalTime>
<o:LastPrinted>2007-02-12T16:46:00Z</o:LastPrinted>
<o:Created>2007-03-25T15:45:00Z</o:Created>
<o:LastSaved>2007-03-25T15:45:00Z</o:LastSaved>
<o:pages>1</o:pages>
<o:Words>5951</o:Words>
<o:Characters>33922</o:Characters>
<o:Company>LDY</o:Company>
<o:Lines>282</o:Lines>
<o:paragraphs>79</o:paragraphs>
<o:CharactersWithSpaces>39794</o:CharactersWithSpaces>
<o:Version>11.5606</o:Version>
</o: DocumentProperties>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:punctuationKerning/>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:SelectEntireFieldWithStartOrEnd/>
<w:UseWord2002TableStyleRules/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState=3D"false" LatentStyleCount=3D"156">
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;
mso-font-charset:2;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:0 268435456 0 0 -2147483648 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:praxisEF-Light;
mso-font-alt:"Courier New";
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-2147483609 64 0 0 1 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;
mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;}
h1
{mso-style-next:Normal;
margin-top:12.0pt;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:3.0pt;
margin-left:0cm;


etc etc
 








Barrel of Fun

Barrel of Fun

Abort, retry, fail
Aug 22, 2005
52,833
Sūþsēaxe: The Land of the South Saxons
Fourteenth Eye said:
the parish council stand firm


_1963606_parish300.jpg
Click to expand...

No no no no no no no no no no no no no YES!! :clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:
 




DIFFBROOK

DIFFBROOK

Really Up the Junction
Feb 3, 2005
2,267
Yorkshire
Also taken from FPC website. This was the costs (as they them) from the last time they appealed following Prescotts decision

"The legal action, if we lose, will cost £60000. The Society of Sussex Downsmen and South Downs Conservation board have both pledged £5000. We are paying half the costs along with Lewes District Council. This means we need to find £25,000. We have already raised £15,000, and so need to find another £10,000. We need to raise this money before we go to court. This will probably not be before June next year. The strange thing about these appeals is that if we win, and I think we will, the government have to pay our costs. We pay nothing. If we lose we pay their costs."

So, the Sussex Downsmen and SD Conservation board probably could probably only muster the same amount of £10k between them this time too. So FPC would need to find £50k if the costs remain about the same. Seeing as they struggled to find half of that last time, I think they are fu*k*d.

They may moan and bl;eat and cry its all so unfair, but the sharp economic realities will hit them hard now that their cash cow of LDC has withdrawn.
 




Curious Orange

Curious Orange

Punxsatawney Phil
Jul 5, 2003
10,158
On NSC for over two decades...
Well, that has brightened my day up. Here's hoping that this time I don't fall off my bike and smash any more teeth!!

It was nice to see the LDC spokesman being so disingenuous at the end. I fail to see how the decision is still "flawed" (if it genuinely was they'd be challenging), or how the planning process has failed, as I think that the one thing this whole saga has proved is that it is genuinely VERY difficult to gain planning permission for developments in an AONB - even when the site consists only of brown field and low-grade arable land!

Well done everyone, but be vigilant for a while longer.
 






The Large One

The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
Sorry to sound like Withdean Wanderer but... for me, there is one bad apple in the whole approval process.

Despite the fact that this is fantastic news, and that we should be celebrating - and that we WILL be celebrating - it gives me a royal pain in the arse to think that despite them wanting to destroy the Albion, telling lies about the immediate environment, insulting the supporters, insulting the residents of Moulsecoomb, lied to their constituents, wanting to clog up the streets of Brighton & Hove, not accepting the reality of the facts of the case, and generally behaving in a manner unbecoming of a local authority or a parish council, we have to 'build bridges' with them.

Ultimately, it is the right thing to do, but these fuckers are going to financially, socially and educationally benefit from a stadium which they claim they don't want, having indirectly cost the club £30m of revenue that we can never get back, without paying a penny towards the cost of it, all the while endeavouring to deny the existence of one of the central and fundamental pillars of any community - a football club.

But I expect I'll get over it.
 






JJ McClure

JJ McClure

Go Jags
Jul 7, 2003
11,042
Hassocks
Good news indeed.
Baker down
LDC down

FPC to go
 




D

DTES

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
6,022
London
Scenes to marvel at.

We're getting there, closer and closer. I can't let myself believe it's 100% just yet - but that just means we should have yet another celebration in 5 weeks.

:thumbsup:
 










You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top
Link Here