Buzzer
Languidly Clinical
- Oct 1, 2006
- 26,121
Before anyone points out that Heskey is not an immigrant, his father is and Griffin is on record as saying that families and children of immigrants are to return with their parents.
From the same page, this also worries me:
We will abolish the ‘positive discrimination’ schemes that have made white Britons second-class citizens.
As far as I'm aware there are no substantive schemes that deliberately discriminate against whites. You could argue housing but that is based on need not race and unfortunately for white Brits (and also black west indian Brits), we tend to be dysfunctional family-wise whereas other races such as Indians are much more family-oriented. What do you do? Single white mother or family of five of Bangladeshi descent? Both are entitled to housing (important point here, both EQUALLY entitled to housing) but it makes sense that the need for bigger accommodation lies with the family.
What the BNP actually mean then, but don't say, is that there would be positive discrimination in favour of whites.
So, seems to me anyway, that non-whites are not allowed to join the ruling party and join in the decision making process and would be discriminated against on important issues like housing, probably education too, probably healthcare too.
That's apartheid isn't it?
EDIT - I'm willing to be shot down on my post here. It's just me reading and interpreting but would be interested to have a debate with someone who voted BNP who says I'm wrong and why. Let's get it all out in the open and have a grown up debate.
From the same page, this also worries me:
We will abolish the ‘positive discrimination’ schemes that have made white Britons second-class citizens.
As far as I'm aware there are no substantive schemes that deliberately discriminate against whites. You could argue housing but that is based on need not race and unfortunately for white Brits (and also black west indian Brits), we tend to be dysfunctional family-wise whereas other races such as Indians are much more family-oriented. What do you do? Single white mother or family of five of Bangladeshi descent? Both are entitled to housing (important point here, both EQUALLY entitled to housing) but it makes sense that the need for bigger accommodation lies with the family.
What the BNP actually mean then, but don't say, is that there would be positive discrimination in favour of whites.
So, seems to me anyway, that non-whites are not allowed to join the ruling party and join in the decision making process and would be discriminated against on important issues like housing, probably education too, probably healthcare too.
That's apartheid isn't it?
EDIT - I'm willing to be shot down on my post here. It's just me reading and interpreting but would be interested to have a debate with someone who voted BNP who says I'm wrong and why. Let's get it all out in the open and have a grown up debate.
Last edited: