To be fair the way it reads does sound like a criticism. If they are the reasons you are referring to then it is not an issue of not wanting him but of not being able to have him. Very different.
The best way to get rid of them will be to promote existing rival candidates that are pro-stadium. Then you will only have to take their existing votes high enough rather than start from scratch with a new candidate.
Spurs paid a lot for him I think and may be trying to initiate a permanent deal, this being the only reason that they loaned him out to Southampton. If thats the case coming to us would never have been considered.
The players will be there it is just a matter of finding ones that are good enough, that we can afford their demands and that we can miraculously persuade to come here.
Not a tangible investment. A bought player will be there either way. However just because we get a loan player doesn't mean we'll stay up so it isn't an ivestment. It's a gamble.
Also, the type of players we need on loan to keep us up will not be signing for us permanently I'm afraid.
Yes, but if you spend it on a loan player to stay up this season then it is gone and the player with it at the end of the season. Then where does that leave us next season? No money, no player and everyone whinging because we're doing shite just like now. Great. Nothing like a good quick fix...
I would imagine if they wanted to prosecute for copyright infringement it wouldn't be too difficult to prove. It'd probably take them about 15 minutes to gather the evidence.