Search results

i agree mate, ones pretty much taking 7/1 to beat city and as you say after that if we through then 7/1 will look very good indeed

should play them the morning of the West Ham game, nice little loosener, perhaps our under 16,s could pop over there and pick up the mandatory 3 points:lolol:

a cynic might say that when Adams said ""Are they good enough to get promoted? I would say not at the moment but they have got to decide if they are looking for player development or promotion." he really meant "no way cos i'm gonna buy your striker and anyone else i can get off you. but of...

dont be cruel

if playing 6 loanees ends in dismal defeat i say let them play 11, they'd never get another bloody point, sorry starry

chelsea i hope. but only cos i hate man ure more

h block next to spence and bulldog

now you mention it i was in a real "hurry" so may have. i thought the technical difficulties was a reference to frasers performance

quandry for the manager, bollickin his player for diving and his team mate for the tackle. just watched it again and no it werent a dive, he was fairly bought down which kinda makes it worse :lolol: :lolol:

did you see the torquay penalty given when one torquay player bought down his team mate...classic. good job the linesman intervened

and i missed first goal whilst having a piss :lolol: but hey 3 points is all i wanted. great to meet up with you guys and i must admit the beers i was kindly bought did lead to me having to navigate steps up to h block with care :lolol:

typical. first game in 5 years, miss first goal cos having a piss and now technical probs :lolol: :lolol:

i go along with your selection fully. wether or not it will be the team selected is another matter. wont be suprised if he keeps anderson in, but certainly he has to give monty a go

and you too sir:wave: and your fellow seafordites

was actually quite pleased with him tonight. i know from reading postings that he's been under pressure but based on the one game ive seen i felt he was fine. was more concerned about contribution of the lad fraser. the sub john should have started but hey, till i have been a few times its...

yep stupid game doug, but then any that show up my complete lack of coordination are stupid:lolol:

Right i'll have a go based on two differentials that need to be taken into account. firstly i had ti keep asking who was who! and secondly had slightly impaired "Fosters" sight, to add to being blind as a bat antway henderson. 7 whing 6 solid but distribution was disappointing hinsh 7 seemed...

can i just say that on first viewing of the guy i was impressed in a lot of his play (given it took a while for me to work out who was who after so long). only thing i would question at times was his distribution down the line when not unduly pressured. wether it was more about the forward runs...

see exactly what you are saying mate. thats why prior to the game , and going on what little id seen and read, i could envisage the kinda game we had. but i saw heck of a lot of fast attacking potential and i can see how well they could do away on counter attack. was not disapointed at all, ive...

you got it spot on mate