Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] "You're black and you stink" Rodriquez comment to Bong? - FA say not proven







Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,141
Goldstone
So he could be found guilty in a kangaroo court at Wembley of "probably" racially abusing someone, and he has no recourse ?

Blimey.
The real Blimey here is that BG is the one talking sense.
 


SeagullinExile

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2010
6,190
London




studio150

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2011
30,227
On the Border
Evidence gathered at the hearing is being considered by the FA, but it could be three weeks before a verdict is announced.

Which virtually takes us to the end of the season, when the incident arose in a match in January.
 




smudge

Up the Albion!
Jul 8, 2003
7,376
On the ocean wave
FA just waiting for the right moment to bury bad news. I have a feeling Mr Trump may be about to provide the ideal cover.
 


Fungus

Well-known member
NSC Patron
May 21, 2004
7,155
Truro
So he could be found guilty in a kangaroo court at Wembley of "probably" racially abusing someone, and he has no recourse ?

Blimey.

Not exactly a "kangaroo court", though.
 










Creaky

Well-known member
Mar 26, 2013
3,862
Hookwood - Nr Horley
So he could be found guilty in a kangaroo court at Wembley of "probably" racially abusing someone, and he has no recourse ?

Blimey.

I presume that if the FA charge stands and he can show a real loss due to the decision he could sue GB for damages and would only have to show that, on the balance of probabilities, he didn’t racially abuse him.
 




Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
43,093
Lancing
The whole things seems a bit of a farce atm. Carpet under sweep exercise seems likely in which case why bother in the first place ?
 


Blue Valkyrie

Not seen such Bravery!
Sep 1, 2012
32,165
Valhalla
Evidence gathered at the hearing is being considered by the FA, but it could be three weeks before a verdict is announced.

Which virtually takes us to the end of the season, when the incident arose in a match in January.
They want West Brom to be mathematically relegated before announcing the decision, so the relegation cannot be blamed on any sanction, and end up in court.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,686
The Fatherland
I presume that if the FA charge stands and he can show a real loss due to the decision he could sue GB for damages and would only have to show that, on the balance of probabilities, he didn’t racially abuse him.

I guess it depends what’s in his Premier League playing contract. I imagine there must be something in it to prevent this as I’m sure John Terry would have tried something? I recall teams could not sue each other, does this still hold?
 




vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
28,272
The whole things seems a bit of a farce atm. Carpet under sweep exercise seems likely in which case why bother in the first place ?

Does seem to be taking forever ? surely by now some decision should have been made ?


PS, Did you enjoy Public Service Broadcasting last week ? had a marvellous time, nice to see we were not the oldest in there !
 


Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
43,093
Lancing
Does seem to be taking forever ? surely by now some decision should have been made ?


PS, Did you enjoy Public Service Broadcasting last week ? had a marvellous time, nice to see we were not the oldest in there !

It was superb !
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Evidence gathered at the hearing is being considered by the FA, but it could be three weeks before a verdict is announced.

Which virtually takes us to the end of the season, when the incident arose in a match in January.

That's ok because if he gets a 5 match suspension, it will carry on until next season. Gordon Greer got a red card at Swindon, we bought him and he was suspended for our first two matches, because he'd only been suspended for one game at his previous club.
 






BensGrandad

New member
Jul 13, 2003
72,015
Haywards Heath
I would say that everything fall down to the High Court ruling that by accepting their contract the players agree to any rules and or findings of the FA. so loss of earnings etc would be totally irrelevant. As has been stated if their was any avenue of a loophole John Terry legal team would have used it.
 


Taybha

Whalewhine
Oct 8, 2008
27,669
Uwantsumorwat
EfBWdJT.gif
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here