So IF Rodgriguez was found guilty (and I recognise he may not) then he'd get a 5-game ban. Which is meaningless because WBA are already down anyway.
Wouldn't be much of a penalty would it?
Alan Pardew is speaking for the defence. Hmm I'm not sure that's going to help him.
So IF Rodgriguez was found guilty (and I recognise he may not) then he'd get a 5-game ban. Which is meaningless because WBA are already down anyway.
Wouldn't be much of a penalty would it?
The ban would be inconsequential , the long term ramifications of a guilty verdict are much more likely to hurt the player , no doubt he will continue to play football for a living but he will always be remembered for that player who racially abused a fellow professional , or not , as the case may be , it's clear that he said something , the whole thing is rather nasty all round , if he's found not guilty then all eyes and pointed finger will be on Bong as to why he would suggest he heard such a thing .
So IF Rodgriguez was found guilty (and I recognise he may not) then he'd get a 5-game ban. Which is meaningless because WBA are already down anyway.
Wouldn't be much of a penalty would it?
I just don't see how anything can be proved beyond reasonable doubt that Rodriguez made a racist remark - its just one mans word against another. The video footage is inconclusive. If it hasn't (or can't) be PROVED, then he'll have to be found innocent. They've rightly charged him, as you have to be seen to be going through due process with a serious allegation such as this, and it must be investigated as thoroughly as possible.
But unless there has been some evidence brought to light that we are not aware of, I can't see how this charge can be upheld.
I noted that Pardew is give evidence for Rodriguez can he say 100% anything more than CH could for Bong.about what was actually said. Of course he cant only what his players said was said.