Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] World Cup - Day Eleven









Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
58,792
hassocks
The ref didn’t have to agree with VAR. I bet outside of Argentina you would struggle to find two people that believed that was a penalty let alone two out of two officials.

You could say the same thing every week in the PL

The idea some sort of order to help Argentina win is in place is fantasy.
 




Pogue Mahone

Well-known member
Apr 30, 2011
10,950
Rio reckons that the four of them in the studio agree that it wasn't a penalty because "We played the game."

Very arrogant and ignorant - you'd be hard pushed to find ANYONE who agrees that that is a penalty.
 




Mackenzie

Old Brightonian
Nov 7, 2003
34,024
East Wales
Thanks - are they normal TV commentators? They sound a bit like those two lads who commentate on the snow-boarding. All a bit hyper and super keen!
No they work on BBC radio 5, you must be watching World Cup extra which gives you the radio commentary on top of the tv feed. It’s a much better commentary usually.

:thumbsup:
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
14,278
Cumbria
Rio reckons that the four of them in the studio agree that it wasn't a penalty because "We played the game."

Very arrogant and ignorant - you'd be hard pushed to find ANYONE who agrees that that is a penalty.
Bit harsh. I think what they said was along the lines of 'hard pushed to find anyone agreeing that was a penalty' ' us four didn't', 'and we played the game'.

The inference I got was that they were saying that the ref didn't know what he was doing because he hadn't played the game.
 


dsr-burnley

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2014
2,634
I'm watching with Spanish commentary and they were saying that the same thing happened in a game with Celta vs Mallorca and it was, by the letter of the law, a penalty. Ergo this was also, according to the letter of the law, a penalty.

Now my Spanish is miles better than my understanding of the rules of football so, can someone enlighten me... what law says that a goalkeeper attempting to intervene with an aerial ball, coming second best to an attacker constitutes a foul? What am I missing?
Then it should be a penalty every time a defender challenges for a header in the area and doesn't get it.
 




Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
6,941
At the centre of Argentina’s midfield is a Brighton player pulling the strings.
In 4 years time there’ll be another one 😁 :bloom:

60C644D3-9560-485D-AC09-99F86A9D875A.jpeg
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
14,278
Cumbria
No they work on BBC radio 5, you must be watching World Cup extra which gives you the radio commentary on top of the tv feed. It’s a much better commentary usually.

:thumbsup:
Oh right - so I am. Channel 601 RB1. Didn't even know there was such a thing, no idea how I landed on that!!

Cheers
 


















Stephen Seagull

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2015
466
Barcelona
Then it should be a penalty every time a defender challenges for a header in the area and doesn't get it.
Hence my confusion, I have no idea what "law" they're talking about...
 








Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
58,792
hassocks
You’re telling me 5 VAR officials thought that was a penalty and the referee rewatched it and also decided it was?

If that’s for Poland there is zero chance that gets given.

You are telling me that 4/5 officials thought the Newcastle player fouls the Crystal Palace defender which lead to a potential winner being ruled out a few weeks ago.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here