Weststander
Well-known member
Kane played well last night. Lovely cross for goal no.2.Haha
Jokes aside that’s got to be the first penalty in football history given for someone getting poked in the eye.
Kane played well last night. Lovely cross for goal no.2.Haha
Jokes aside that’s got to be the first penalty in football history given for someone getting poked in the eye.
The ref didn’t have to agree with VAR. I bet outside of Argentina you would struggle to find two people that believed that was a penalty let alone two out of two officials.
A R5 double act on Sunday evenings.Thanks - are they normal TV commentators? They sound a bit like those two lads who commentate on the snow-boarding. All a bit hyper and super keen!
No they work on BBC radio 5, you must be watching World Cup extra which gives you the radio commentary on top of the tv feed. It’s a much better commentary usually.Thanks - are they normal TV commentators? They sound a bit like those two lads who commentate on the snow-boarding. All a bit hyper and super keen!
Bit harsh. I think what they said was along the lines of 'hard pushed to find anyone agreeing that was a penalty' ' us four didn't', 'and we played the game'.Rio reckons that the four of them in the studio agree that it wasn't a penalty because "We played the game."
Very arrogant and ignorant - you'd be hard pushed to find ANYONE who agrees that that is a penalty.
Then it should be a penalty every time a defender challenges for a header in the area and doesn't get it.I'm watching with Spanish commentary and they were saying that the same thing happened in a game with Celta vs Mallorca and it was, by the letter of the law, a penalty. Ergo this was also, according to the letter of the law, a penalty.
Now my Spanish is miles better than my understanding of the rules of football so, can someone enlighten me... what law says that a goalkeeper attempting to intervene with an aerial ball, coming second best to an attacker constitutes a foul? What am I missing?
In 4 years time there’ll be another oneAt the centre of Argentina’s midfield is a Brighton player pulling the strings.
Oh right - so I am. Channel 601 RB1. Didn't even know there was such a thing, no idea how I landed on that!!No they work on BBC radio 5, you must be watching World Cup extra which gives you the radio commentary on top of the tv feed. It’s a much better commentary usually.
Rio reckons that the four of them in the studio agree that it wasn't a penalty because "We played the game."
Very arrogant and ignorant - you'd be hard pushed to find ANYONE who agrees that that is a penalty.
You’re telling me 5 VAR officials thought that was a penalty and the referee rewatched it and also decided it was?It’s just a shit call. It’s not fixed.
Unless you’ve got traces of cocaine from partying.Part of the game is surely respecting and attending routine drugs tests isn’t it?!
Hence my confusion, I have no idea what "law" they're talking about...Then it should be a penalty every time a defender challenges for a header in the area and doesn't get it.
You’re telling me 5 VAR officials thought that was a penalty and the referee rewatched it and also decided it was?
If that’s for Poland there is zero chance that gets given.