….unlike the ref and VAR.Justice.
I actually don’t mind Argentina. But the goalie was doing his job, well.
If Harry Kane had won a penalty like that you’d be having a field day.Justice.
I actually don’t mind Argentina. But the goalie was doing his job, well.
Justice! Incredible save
Can they make it anymore obvious they are trying to fix this so that Messi/Argies go through?
I’m a heartless soul. Having no sympathy for Kane and Zaha’s medical issues with balance.If Harry Kane had won a penalty like that you’d be having a field day.
For both VAR and the ref to think that is a penalty is certainly suspicious.It’s just a shit call. It’s not fixed.
HahaI’m a heartless soul. Having no sympathy for Kane and Zaha’s medical issues with balance.
For both VAR and the ref to think that is a penalty is certainly suspicious.
Chris Sutton and Allister Bruce-Ball?I'm quite enjoying these commentators - Chris & Bruce. Who are they?
The ref didn’t have to agree with VAR. I bet outside of Argentina you would struggle to find two people that believed that was a penalty let alone two out of two officials.It’s really not, there are awful calls using VAR weekly
How many goals did they have ruled out in first game?
Thanks - are they normal TV commentators? They sound a bit like those two lads who commentate on the snow-boarding. All a bit hyper and super keen!Chris Sutton and Allister Bruce-Ball?
Surely because the opportunity had been taken? Ergo there was no opportunity to deny?I'm watching with Spanish commentary and they were saying that the same thing happened in a game with Celta vs Mallorca and it was, by the letter of the law, a penalty. Ergo this was also, according to the letter of the law, a penalty.
Now my Spanish is miles better than my understanding of the rules of football so, can someone enlighten me... what law says that a goalkeeper attempting to intervene with an aerial ball, coming second best to an attacker constitutes a foul? What am I missing?