- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,701
I'm pleased there is so much thoughful comment on this thread. And I'm glad it hasn'y (yet) been taken down due to trolling.
I like to think that it proves there's more thoughtful and intelligent posters on NSC than idiots
I'm pleased there is so much thoughful comment on this thread. And I'm glad it hasn'y (yet) been taken down due to trolling.
The Tideway minibus still had something like "Tideway School and Sixth Form" on it when I was there. The sixth form had very much gone by then (along with about 1500 pupils after the school in Peacehaven opened), because nobody in their right mind would want to do their A-Levels at Tideway.
Many many years before, my dad passed his 11+ and got sent to the local secondary modern anyway due to "lack of space". A few years later my mum lucked into going to a Comprehensive which had been converted from a Secondary Modern by replacing the sign outside, and nothing else.
I came across a statistic once about the proportion of people who went to Secondary Moderns compared to how many university students had been to them (before Comprehensives were brought in), which was something ridiculous like 80% compared to about 5% (yes I have made those numbers up, it was a while ago). They're just a bad idea which consigned thousands of people to the scrap heap for no good reason, and in some areas continue to do so.
There are many factors, but I have read a few studies that point to Teacher expectation as having a significant effect on student achievement. Maybe having the chav mum, living on an estate full of non working single parents is affecting teachers expectations of what that student can achieve more than the circumstances themselves being the major limiting factor.
Whilst there is some truth (self-fulfilling prophecy etc) it's a very simplistic way of framing it as it implies that teacher expectations are based on social factors instead of early assessment data. When children come into an EYFS setting, they perform a baseline assessment and then strategies are put in place in order to help them reach Early Learning Goals (or ELG). Whether they achieve that or not depends on future assessment expectations at primary level. The issue is, children who have less support at home (especially in early reading, fine motor skills and speech) are less likely to achieve ELG and, statistically, schools in more deprived areas have a much lower % of children achieving ELG. I doubt however that this is because of teacher expectations and far more to do with parental engagement at home.
Another thing that I don't think has been mentioned on here.
People who are prepared to emigrate, leaving family, friends, culture and everything else they know have, by that very act, shown that they are prepared to make hard decisions and will work hard to try and achieve their ambitions. It's not really a surprise if that ambition is then instilled in their children.
One of the studies I saw actually placed kids with teachers that didn't know them and told the teachers that the groups that had been assessed as "low", for want of a better term were, "high" and vice versa, the finding was that the kids closely matched the achievement levels that the teachers had been told they should reach, the "high" kids under achieved, and the "low" kids over achieved compared to their official assessment. I have got some shit to do today, but I will try and find it later.
how much is down to an inherently racist media who push divisive agendas?