- Jan 18, 2009
- 4,886
I think your quote is illogical since this is what taxes are for, they are not subsidies, and many of the recipients would also be taxpayers.
I’m agnostic about the application, I used the term as it was a direct reference to the post I was responding to.
However since you raise the point, I would not say it’s use was illogical, in many respect tax payers are subsidising many Government services, for example people say the NHS is free, it’s not it’s subsidised by the U.K. taxpayer.
What is a Subsidy?
A subsidy is a benefit given to an individual, business, or institution, usually by the government. It is usually in the form of a cash payment or a tax reduction. The subsidy is typically given to remove some type of burden, and it is often considered to be in the overall interest of the public, given to promote a social good or an economic policy.
What do you think.....based on the above is it illogical to refer to taxpayer funded school meal programmes that are free to poor pupils as subsided?
I don’t think so but I will bow to your evident superiority in English language.