depends on what "the problem" is. so far your just saying the problem is someone is richer than thou. from the perspective of a subsistance farmer in Bangledesh, you are considerable richer, you're part of the problem too. whats the real problem concerning everyone here? what gets fixed when we take away all the concentrated wealth?
millionairesforhumanity.org
Never thought I’d see Guy Fawkes sticking up for the establishment
I am content with Starmer while thinking the legislation seems rushed. Maybe it isn't rushed.Changed your mind from yesterday?
‘’The wider issue - I am not sure what to make of Starmer yet. I personally liked the era of Campbell and Mandleson who knew how to spin a difficult policy. Starmer doesn't do that, and yet this legislation seems rushed.’’
Would paying off the national debt be a reasonable way to compare the two parties, since the war say? Who is the party of fiscal responsibility?
That sounds like a good one? Who has historically paid off the most? And can you answer that in percentage and absolute terms so as not to trick us? And also note based on how long each party has had in power, given some parties haven't had much opportunity to pay it off.
Haven't they just added to it ?
Historically I mean, which party has paid off more of the national debt?
From methane alone.
Sorry, you've lost me.
That's not what I asked, is it?
Sorry, I didn't understand the question, could you rephrase it?
Does it make sense to pay it off, so you can build it back up again?
I see! Are you suggesting we should never pay it off?
Were you/are you an MP?
I'm guessing you're aware that you still haven't answered my straight forward question! Would you like to address the issue?
