jackalbion
Well-known member
- Aug 30, 2011
- 4,920
The service levels are the same, theres 90% of the time 6 and on a rare occasion 5 trains per hour. The only game this season that had 5 was Liverpool. The lengthening is an interesting one. The total carriage capacity for the Falmer route is 44 (2x 8 car to Eastbourne/Ore, 2x 8 car to Seaford and 2x 6 car Lewes), in reality with the withdrawal of class 313s with only 4 car units available for Lewes Shuttle that is down to 40. This is where the current problems are coming from, lack of available stock to extend the trains. The 700 idea is a good but the unit is not route cleared to go beyond Lewes and if that had to turn around at the Lewes 58 signal that would reduce the capacity, thats before you even touch upon the fact that Southern drivers don't have traction knowledge or Thameslink have very limited drivers route knowledge. Furthermore there isn't really enough 700s to cover the Thameslink services. Its a supply problem, the government need to tender more stock for all routes in this country not just Southern, instead of retiring units without replacement, or refusing to pay leasing costs on perfectly good working semi modern units (class 379s or 360s for example).I think the problems we are seeing on the trains is down to a number of factors:
1. Less provision from Southern. Pre-Covid we typically had 6 trains per hour, most if not all, lengthened. My observation is now we get about 5 per hour with just the odd one lengthened.
2. Loss of Bennett's Field parking.
3. Stadium capacity increase of around 1000.
4. More sell outs and fewer no-shows.
Lengthening Falmer station platforms and replacing 2 four-car 377 trains with 12-car class 700 units would give an enormous capacity increase of over 5000 per hour and reduce the train queues massively.