If it's a Tory idea, there will be some unqualified toff somewhere in line to make a shed load of money out of it and somebody else will be losing something. That's the Tory way.
Good thing. People might take it more seriously for one reason. But also who doesn't have ID these days, can only be for criminal reasons? I'm struggling to think of any other legitimate reason.
Good thing. People might take it more seriously for one reason. But also who doesn't have ID these days, can only be for criminal reasons? I'm struggling to think of any other legitimate reason.
Good thing. People might take it more seriously for one reason. But also who doesn't have ID these days, can only be for criminal reasons? I'm struggling to think of any other legitimate reason.
I don't drive and my passport expired 3 years ago. What do I need a photo ID card for?Good thing. People might take it more seriously for one reason. But also who doesn't have ID these days, can only be for criminal reasons? I'm struggling to think of any other legitimate reason.
Good thing. People might take it more seriously for one reason. But also who doesn't have ID these days, can only be for criminal reasons? I'm struggling to think of any other legitimate reason.
I don't drive and my passport expired 3 years ago. What do I need a photo ID card for?
open a bank account. register for benefits. use local library. attend a political party conference.
open a bank account. register for benefits. use local library. attend a political party conference.
What if you already have a bank account and don't need benefits?
then you're probably in fortune position of not worrying about being so poor you cant afford a car or ever go abroad.
its just funny really how libraries issue photo ID to use their service, but there is opposition to the principle of needing ID to vote. maybe we shouldnt be required to register, encourage people to turn up on the day.
voter fraud at the polls is negligable, far more likely through postal voting, will be fun to see whats proposed there.
Excellent. Thanks for your reply. Ah, yes, the ranking of candidates in multi-seat constituencies. I like that. Direct voting for local MPs but with it clear and obvious that the people selected will reflect the rank order preference of local voters. And at the end of the day the government will still be formed by the party with the majority of seats (or a coaltion, which wouldn't feel like a kick in the teeth to those of us who 'didn't vote for a coalition' because of the candidate ranking mking voting feel different fowm what it feels like presently).
Having looked up the detail on Wikipedia I see what I imagine is the reason why this has not been adopted; there are multiple different ways of casting the votes (e.g., rank all candidates or only those you like, rank by party or individual candidate?) and transferring the vote (I won't list the possibilities and the caveats for this) and, no doubt, those who want FPTP replaced have differing views on which system they prefer. And of course there are others who favour crude PR, party lists and all.
I guess change will require all those opposed to FPTP to come together around one system and sell it, or FPTP will always appear to be the single most popular system.
Meanwhile, of course, the turkeys (HMG and HMLO - aka HMG optimistically in waiting) won't be voting for Christmas (electoral reform).
its just funny really how libraries issue photo ID to use their service, but there is opposition to the principle of needing ID to vote.
then you're probably in fortune position of not worrying about being so poor you cant afford a car or ever go abroad.
its just funny really how libraries issue photo ID to use their service, but there is opposition to the principle of needing ID to vote. maybe we shouldnt be required to register, encourage people to turn up on the day.
voter fraud at the polls is negligable, far more likely through postal voting, will be fun to see whats proposed there.
Im against it. You should stay weird and special on your island.
Again, there's a difference between having a requirement for photo ID to use an optional service, and requiring it to vote, which is somebody's right.
and again, doesn't seem to be a problem for all the other countries that require ID to vote. maybe we have better rights then they do, haven't seen anyone make that argument yet.