Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] "Vaccine-status Certifications" may be required to attend sporting events



ken tiler

Active member
Nov 24, 2007
343
Brighton
My wife’s a care worker and has had both shots - she is still tested twice a week with the lateral flow test and once a week at a test centre. Two of her colleagues, likewise vaccinated, have tested positive in the last three weeks.

I’m booked to get my second shot this week but will still take the opportunity to be tested regularly until such time as the virus is no more common than other contagious diseases. Why wouldn’t I? I don’t understand any reluctance to be tested in the same way as I don’t understand a reluctance to be vaccinated. The test is to protect others.

You`ve answered your own question. The virus is now no more common than other contagious diseases. The figures for positive tests have plummeted to almost zero. For people under age 80 with no comorbidiies, the risks from covid-19 are very small. There are also risks attached to taking an injection. Its a question of balance of risk for an individual depending on their own circumstances. There is little evidence of asymptomatic spread of covid 19, so mass testing is a vast waste of resources. However, as with the introduction of masks last summer, when the corona positive testing rates were equally low, the government hoped to encourage people back onto public transport and go out to boost economic activity. I see this testing and vaccination effort as part of the same political pantomime.
 




The Wizard

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2009
18,399
https://twitter.com/ianm1871/status/1379081576617799683?s=21

Matt Hancock in January ‘Testing healthy people isn’t reliable and we won’t do it’

2 days ago: ‘Vaccines are our route back to normality, make sure you get your jabs when called up’


Today: ‘Regularly testing healthy people twice per week is our route back to normality’


I very rarely say this, but I HATE Matt Hancock with a passion I’ve not often felt for any other person, it’s a struggle to believe he’s not just a big phony on a massive wind up trip, the under qualified, unelected, incompetent disgrace of a human being.
 


ken tiler

Active member
Nov 24, 2007
343
Brighton
https://twitter.com/ianm1871/status/1379081576617799683?s=21

Matt Hancock in January ‘Testing healthy people isn’t reliable and we won’t do it’

2 days ago: ‘Vaccines are our route back to normality, make sure you get your jabs when called up’


Today: ‘Regularly testing healthy people twice per week is our route back to normality’


I very rarely say this, but I HATE Matt Hancock with a passion I’ve not often felt for any other person, it’s a struggle to believe he’s not just a big phony on a massive wind up trip, the under qualified, unelected, incompetent disgrace of a human being.

Spot on. Every time the goalposts are moved.
 


studio150

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2011
30,211
On the Border
Is it just me but given that the lateral flow tests are undertaken at home and you record your own result on line, aren't they just a waste of time. In that if I want to attend a game and have no symptoms I can just record a negative outcome and attend the game safe in the knowledge that any temperature check will be fine. Or is there more to these tests that I'm not aware of.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,605
The Fatherland
Is it just me but given that the lateral flow tests are undertaken at home and you record your own result on line.

How do the government prevent people from falsely recording a negative if they need this result to get into the pub or football or something?
 




nwgull

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2003
14,532
Manchester
https://twitter.com/ianm1871/status/1379081576617799683?s=21

Matt Hancock in January ‘Testing healthy people isn’t reliable and we won’t do it’

2 days ago: ‘Vaccines are our route back to normality, make sure you get your jabs when called up’


Today: ‘Regularly testing healthy people twice per week is our route back to normality’


I very rarely say this, but I HATE Matt Hancock with a passion I’ve not often felt for any other person, it’s a struggle to believe he’s not just a big phony on a massive wind up trip, the under qualified, unelected, incompetent disgrace of a human being.

They’re all a bunch of *****. Ignoring the advice of SAGE on lockdowns at various points of the last 12 months is bordering on criminal.
 


ken tiler

Active member
Nov 24, 2007
343
Brighton
They’re all a bunch of *****. Ignoring the advice of SAGE on lockdowns at various points of the last 12 months is bordering on criminal.

SAGE are also part of the problem. We should have kept to October 2019 WHO advice on pandemics as followed by Sweden and Finland.
 








Perfidious Albion

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2011
6,361
At the end of my tether
"Danes will have to show proof of vaccination, proof of earlier infection or a recent negative test to access services such as hairdressers, restaurants and cinemas
Sweden has been considering similar plans."

Someone said that the risks to the under 80s if healthy are very small........I would try telling that to my friend who recently lost his otherwise healthy wife to Covid. She was 60ish.
 


Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,455
Brighton
How do the government prevent people from falsely recording a negative if they need this result to get into the pub or football or something?

My understanding is you get a unique code from the test which you then enter into the app, or something like that?
 






Green Cross Code Man

Wunt be druv
Mar 30, 2006
20,714
Eastbourne
"Danes will have to show proof of vaccination, proof of earlier infection or a recent negative test to access services such as hairdressers, restaurants and cinemas
Sweden has been considering similar plans."

Someone said that the risks to the under 80s if healthy are very small........I would try telling that to my friend who recently lost his otherwise healthy wife to Covid. She was 60ish.
Yep and my American friend's dad in his 60's died from Covid 2 weeks ago. He didn't believe Covid was very dangerous and refused a vaccine. He was otherwise healthy.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,605
The Fatherland
My understanding is you get a unique code from the test which you then enter into the app, or something like that?

I was thinking more along the lines of you get a negative friend to stick the swab up their nose, or you don’t stick the swab anywhere before testing it etc. I’m just curious what safeguards are in place to stop abuse of self-testing.
 






Neville's Breakfast

Well-known member
May 1, 2016
13,450
Oxton, Birkenhead
I was thinking more along the lines of you get a negative friend to stick the swab up their nose, or you don’t stick the swab anywhere before testing it etc. I’m just curious what safeguards are in place to stop abuse of self-testing.

If it’s anything like the school testing then the answer is none. My wife self tests twice a week and loads her results on to a website. She could be testing the dog for all the authorities know. Society’s protection from the virus is reliant on most people doing the right thing. It’s a bit like drink driving in that respect ie generally unenforceable but having guidance for decent people can save lives even if selfish people will still cost lives of others.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,605
The Fatherland
If it’s anything like the school testing then the answer is none. My wife self tests twice a week and loads her results on to a website. She could be testing the dog for all the authorities know. Society’s protection from the virus is reliant on most people doing the right thing. It’s a bit like drink driving in that respect ie generally unenforceable but having guidance for decent people can save lives even if selfish people will still cost lives of others.

Fair enough. I am sure the vast majority of people will do the right thing. I just worry that some idiot might be tempted to fiddle the results and cause an outbreak at the football or a concert etc.
 


Neville's Breakfast

Well-known member
May 1, 2016
13,450
Oxton, Birkenhead
Fair enough. I am sure the vast majority of people will do the right thing. I just worry that some idiot might be tempted to fiddle the results and cause an outbreak at the football or a concert etc.

It’s a valid worry. It’s one of the reasons I am a little doubtful when people say everything returns to normal in June. We have theatre tickets in Liverpool postponed from February to May and now to September. We are looking forward to it but won’t be skipping there without a care in the world.
 




mwrpoole

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2010
1,519
Sevenoaks
Fair enough. I am sure the vast majority of people will do the right thing. I just worry that some idiot might be tempted to fiddle the results and cause an outbreak at the football or a concert etc.

It might be that self tests can’t be used for this purpose. There are loads of test centres doing the quick swab test and then you get an official sms to show results within an hour.

As someone doing the self tests at home you don’t even have to do a test. You can simply go to the website, put your name, date & ‘result’ in and job done. You don’t even log in, just enter basic details & submit.
 


Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
58,773
hassocks
Fair enough. I am sure the vast majority of people will do the right thing. I just worry that some idiot might be tempted to fiddle the results and cause an outbreak at the football or a concert etc.

I am assuming that Johnson is telling the truth.....

But when this is rolled out won’t everyone have had at least 1 jab?

What are the chances of an outbreak happening and causing an issue?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here