LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Simple solution, seggregated stands. Put all those who refuse to be vaccinated in one section.
Haha .,cracking humour
Last edited:
Simple solution, seggregated stands. Put all those who refuse to be vaccinated in one section.
So for someone like me who won’t be offered a vaccine till at least July, the only way for the young generations to get a ‘green’ pass is to naturally become infected? What a dangerous road to go down,
In addition to this, I worked in a theatre up until last year, so what about all the people under 30/40 who work in football stadiums etc? Will they have to be tested 7 days a week?
Trust me, once you’ve had one of those bloody swaps stuck half way into the back of your head, you won’t be wanting to do it twice weekly, this is ANOTHER policy designed to segregate and pit sections of society against each other.
So for someone like me who won’t be offered a vaccine till at least July, the only way for the young generations to get a ‘green’ pass is to naturally become infected? What a dangerous road to go down,
In addition to this, I worked in a theatre up until last year, so what about all the people under 30/40 who work in football stadiums etc? Will they have to be tested 7 days a week?
Trust me, once you’ve had one of those bloody swaps stuck half way into the back of your head, you won’t be wanting to do it twice weekly, this is ANOTHER policy designed to segregate and pit sections of society against each other.
This was certainly something that occurred to me.
Young people are disproportionately employed in the hospitality and entertainment industries. At the Amex the vast majority of the concourse servers seemed to be very young, as you'd expect if recruited via agency or the university. Plus on match day I've often seen a lot of our youth players hanging around.
If this comes in I suspect there will be no one to serve in the concourse,whether it's inside or out and a lot of the younger age group players will need to start going through Covid protocols.
I'm assuming that my son's twice weekly tests will suffice for him as, at age 14, he's not going to get a jab at all.
But, though I'm against the idea of the "passport" for football because of its practicalities, there is no excuse not to get vaccinated when your turn does come up. Being able to afford a smart phone doesn't matter and isn't relevant.
No, they haven’t. There is a global pandemic and they just happen to be that age at the moment. It’s circumstances and we can’t fail to protect society because we are worried about their ‘rights.’ Past generations were unfortunate enough to be young during wars or previous pandemics. It is what it is. I would still rather be 20 than 54 right now.
Correct me if I am wrong but the smartphone debate(?) revolved around the passport not over the discussion on taking a vaccine
Yep, but was answered a while back in that you can also have a paper version.
Perhaps I'm getting cynical in my old age but someone (not you) who has regularly posted anti-lockdown protest support on here suddenly coming out with "what if you can't afford a smart phone" sounds like someone who is getting their excuses in early.
I may, of course, be totally wrong. Will you be getting your vaccine [MENTION=33983]BeHereNow[/MENTION] ?
That’s not the argument and you know it
29 rather than 54 is a stupid comment. No one is going to say anything other than that. Christ l’d love to have another crack at life.
The fact is the young have nothing to fear from COVID but have to follow the rules to protect those that do. Morally it’s the only way. Yet this will cost a student 7k in accommodation costs that they won’t use and 9k on a course that isn’t fit for purpose. They will get nothing back because the government and uni’s can’t afford it. They regularly get a slating from the press, politicians and over the 50’s who they are ironically protecting. Now it would appear that as they are last on the list they will be the last back in society. TBH, I think most will get the first jab by then but it is taking the piss.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
My reply was a bit glib, sorry
Simple solution, seggregated stands. Put all those who refuse to be vaccinated in one section.
It would need two away ends though. Do we put the anti vaxxer northerners next to the anti vaxxer BHA fans ? Decisions, decisions
If only it were that simple. You can't put the anti-vaxers in with the haven't-had-the-chance-of-vaxers and then there's the whether-i-have-is-none-of-your-business-vaxers to consider
Only secondary children not all school age. And I've been doing 2 tests a week as have many of my colleagues since schools fully reopened and although it's not a pleasant exercise, it's really not that bad.I don't disagree with you, but everyone with school age children is already supposed to be doing this.
Unfortunately it seems to be part of a pattern over the last 30 years of the generation born between 1945 and around 1970 who continually pull the ladder up which they themselves have climbed up and done very well out of. From the assault on pensions and the spiralling of house prices through to Brexit and now this, it’s another action which disadvantages the young. Which is not, of course, to say it’s a conscious decision to act for that reason, nor does it mean people who like or support one element support every other element. But it’s part of an undeniable pattern of the young being screwed over time and again. It’s no coincidence this generation is the first in recent history to be worse off and have worse prospects than their parents.
Our family friends daughter 26 and her boyfriend 30 both worked hard, saved for 5-6 years and last week put a deposit down on a house. They made it work, by going to work.