I thought all Horsham blokes were twats. (unless they support BHA, of course)The Large One said:So, ignoring Zefarelly's post, can we all assume that this Horsham bloke is a bit of a twat?
perseus said:Cement Works:
Asbestos contamination and demolition will cost £10 million extra. Maybe much more, more like £20 million?
Railway would cost £120 million.
Roads would add on £35 million.
And it is completely unnecesary because there is a perfectly good alternative site at Pende anyway, which would be cheaper and bigger than Falmer with better transport links.
Some people may not think Pende is any good. But it is not only better than Falmer, but it is a better location than every single football stadium location in England.
But do not let facts get in the way, they may only be opinions.
By the way, it would be quicker as well.
As I think Prescott will probably say No (the Dibden Ports plan was turned down) I think Pende may turn out to be the best plan.
Falmer is flawed.
It is not big enough and is too expensive. No room for expansion.
I think Pende would be the best bet.
However, until the consensus says that Pende is better than Falmer, or Prescott says NO, Falmer will always remain favourite.
zefarelly said:1 - crap , people will travel miles and do so more and more these days
2 - the road is easily widened and the bed of the railway is still in place, also theres a bus service in place which could easily be 'upped' at peak times
3- decontaminate ? explain . . .theres a lot of chalk dust but not much else, a lot of the old kit could be recycled/sold as scrap or even sold to the far east (happening a lot with old machinery), but I do agree its a bit project to manage which ever way you look at it.
4 - you've been brainwashed by Crabtree
fatboy said:It has to be 12 or 8 or whatever amount of miles it is from Brighton.