It was good to see Mitoma come on for the last part of the game and inject some much needed pace and stretch Spurs tiring defenders. However what was the point in introducing Lallana? He is golod at what he does as a defensive midfielder, but we were trying to unlock the oppostion defence, it wasn't his sort of game at all.
We also made two fujrther substitutions in the 86th minute, why? there is precious little that anyone can do to change anything in 4 minutes!
I think he has to start vs either Brentford or Forest. The ‘system’ will have to be quite different as you suggest as Undav is really not a DW type of player. I suspect the tactical change necessary for him to thrive on Saturday was too much for De Zerbi to implement with substitutions.It’s quite clear right now that although DW is not scoring the goals, he definitely helps our style of play, and brings others into the attack. In games without him last season we were utterly toothless and predictable. Playing Undav either means dropping Welbeck, and an overall change of style, or him playing instead of Tross or Gross who both have been decent. So not surprised Undav hasn't started games. I am however surprised he has not seen more minutes coming off the bench. I would have preferred him on for the last 5/10 last night instead of Gilmour.
I'd be shocked to see that formation any time soon.I think he has to start vs either Brentford or Forest. The ‘system’ will have to be quite different as you suggest as Undav is really not a DW type of player. I suspect the tactical change necessary for him to thrive on Saturday was too much for De Zerbi to implement with substitutions.
But I can see a fluid 4-3-3 starting formation being selected soon that would see a front 3 of Mitoma, Undav and another, perhaps someone like Sarmiento or Enciso whilst Welbeck & Trossard get a break from the starting line-up.
Something like this:
———————Sanchez———————-
Lamptey—-Webster—Dunk—-Estupiñán
——Gilmour—Caicedo—Mac Allister——
—-Sarmiento—-Undav—Mitoma———-
I was thinking that we’d need to wait for the cup to see a formation like this but with our lack of a goal threat against Spurs, it might be time for RDZ to unleash his preferred back 4 sooner rather than later.
This formation was about resting key players such as Welbeck, Veltman, Groß, March and Trossard rather than dropping anyone due to 3 games in 8 days. We might end up resting Mac, Caicedo and Webster? I do think that have we’ll have to rotate the squad over this busy period.I'd be shocked to see that formation any time soon.
Firstly, Veltman is for me an automatic starter in any game, a much better defender than Lamptey.
Also I can't see Trossard getting dropped for any PL games.
However, I could see us going to a back 4 to bring in Mitoma (might mean Gross dropping out of the starting 11 to accommodate.
Although I do think De Zerbi may well revert to his preferred 4 at the back, I suspect that it won't be until post-World Cup. Other than Gilmour, I don't see Lamptey, Sarmiento, Undav or Mitoma breaking into the line up before Christmas. Still, what do I know?I think he has to start vs either Brentford or Forest. The ‘system’ will have to be quite different as you suggest as Undav is really not a DW type of player. I suspect the tactical change necessary for him to thrive on Saturday was too much for De Zerbi to implement with substitutions.
But I can see a fluid 4-3-3 starting formation being selected soon that would see a front 3 of Mitoma, Undav and another, perhaps someone like Sarmiento or Enciso whilst Welbeck & Trossard get a break from the starting line-up.
Something like this:
———————Sanchez———————-
Lamptey—-Webster—Dunk—-Estupiñán
——Gilmour—Caicedo—Mac Allister——
—-Sarmiento—-Undav—Mitoma———-
I was thinking that we’d need to wait for the cup to see a formation like this but with our lack of a goal threat against Spurs, it might be time for RDZ to unleash his preferred back 4 sooner rather than later.
I disagree, we have two winnable games in 4 days, and need to put our best team(s) out for those games. No one should be tired this early in the season.This formation was about resting key players such as Welbeck, Veltman, Groß, March and Trossard rather than dropping anyone due to 3 games in 8 days. We might end up resting Mac, Caicedo and Webster? I do think that have we’ll have to rotate the squad over this busy period.
Only until Wednesday!Ferguson, despite being SEVENTEEN, looks a much more likely contributor this season and that's telling.
Wages would still be nuts and that wouldn't go down well with other playersI think Brighton should have taken a punt for Ronaldo. Ok 37 but not getting much playing time at Man U. Could still do a job at a mid-table club like us.
I think he could still piss them off even if his wages were cut down to Brighton levels!Wages would still be nuts and that wouldn't go down well with other players
Agree that he'll rest players but can't see him starting a front 3 who have not started a PL game.This formation was about resting key players such as Welbeck, Veltman, Groß, March and Trossard rather than dropping anyone due to 3 games in 8 days. We might end up resting Mac, Caicedo and Webster? I do think that have we’ll have to rotate the squad over this busy period.
Heard Mbappé wants out at PSG. Worth a punt.I think Brighton should have taken a punt for Ronaldo. Ok 37 but not getting much playing time at Man U. Could still do a job at a mid-table club like us.
RDZ's whole plan is based around quick, accurate passing, under pressure. If you don't see how Lallana fits into that, there's no help for you.It was good to see Mitoma come on for the last part of the game and inject some much needed pace and stretch Spurs tiring defenders. However what was the point in introducing Lallana? He is golod at what he does as a defensive midfielder, but we were trying to unlock the oppostion defence, it wasn't his sort of game at all.
We also made two fujrther substitutions in the 86th minute, why? there is precious little that anyone can do to change anything in 4 minutes!