The old NRA argument, which ends at the obvious conclusion that the way to stop all gun crime is to ensure that everyone in the UK MUST carry guns
She could probably kick him in the bollocks faster than he could draw.
[News] UK to increase nuclear warheads by 40%
- Thread starter WATFORD zero
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
She could probably kick him in the bollocks faster than he could draw.
Well that strikes China and Russia from the list, too much to lose, both take our threat very seriously, so that leaves us with Rouge Nations such as the PRNK, our intelligence suggests they haven’t got the capability’s to come through the door at present so by my reckoning the deterrents working [emoji106][emoji120]
paulfuzz
Well-known member
This poor hypothetical woman has to decide between a gun, self defence lessons or a swift kick to the bollocks!!
You can " pull this apart line by line " all you want , you`ve already made it clear what you are going to say , i`m wrong you`re right . I am happy with what i have said and checked my facts , so if you don`t like it that`s fine .
Don’t forget ICBM’s [emoji23]
paulfuzz
Well-known member
An attack on one NATO country is deemed an attack on them all. It does not necessarily mean that the UK's Nukes (which are American) are the reason the Russians or Chinese are in anyway concerned of the UK's missiles. PRNK are likely to target the US however futile this may be and the Chinese would never allow it.
Meanwhile it is the ordinary man and woman in any of these countries who would pay the price. The politicians and selected others would be safe in their luxury deep underground bunkers paid for by those who are left to suffer the effects of the disaster.
I get it, your not a fan of nuclear deterrent, that’s fair although it would of saved a bit of time if you’d just said that in the beginning [emoji23]
All I’ll say is that in October 62 the world came within inches of WW3 and probably unspeakable ramifications, thankfully the pause for thought that was afforded to the Russians imho saved the world and indeed has continued to do so ever since.
Nice chatting to you [emoji106]
HastingsSeagull
Well-known member
1. Why ?
China
2. How are we going to pay for it given our current debt situation ?
China, however most likely indirectly, by trading with nations that rely massively on China to make themselves richer whilst simultaneously being bent over and rodgered overall by......... China.
China
2. How are we going to pay for it given our current debt situation ?
China, however most likely indirectly, by trading with nations that rely massively on China to make themselves richer whilst simultaneously being bent over and rodgered overall by......... China.
Charlies Shinpad
New member
As a little footnote.
The UK is at 15 minutes notice to fire it's Nuclear missiles at all times.
Sent from my EML-L09 using Tapatalk
The UK is at 15 minutes notice to fire it's Nuclear missiles at all times.
Sent from my EML-L09 using Tapatalk
paulfuzz
Well-known member
Not a fan of nuclear weapons no, but worse than that are the fools that are in control of them.
Nice chatting to you too
The good news is there have been many fine examples of fools over the last 50 years in control of such weapons and touch wood....... [emoji106]
maffew
Well-known member
Boris, we need more water cannons not nukes 
paulfuzz
Well-known member
Good point!! lets hope the global population's luck holds out
Shropshire Seagull
Well-known member
And I'll wager it will all the time there is a stalemate on the chessboard of nuclear weapons. aka the deterrent.
nicko31
Well-known member
Boris, we need more water cannons not nukes
Sold for scrap, though I think we may need them soon to uphold the law
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...ed-water-cannon-sold-for-scrap-at-300000-loss
I appreciate you quite literally have wet dreams about disorder in the UK in the form of an uprising but this has got the square root of **** all to do with this topic so please do **** off back to your negative news feed type posts Old Nick [emoji106]
How is 200 warheads more of a deterrent than 140 warheads?
It's just crazy.
Risk Peace not War.