RossyG
Well-known member
- Dec 20, 2014
- 2,630
Because it distracts from the mess the UK has created with Covid and Brexit ?
And today’s Shoehorn Award goes to...
Because it distracts from the mess the UK has created with Covid and Brexit ?
I hadn't seen anything on the news about this, and certainly hope this isn't right, but
Russia condemns UK plan to increase nuclear weapons as threat to ‘international stability’
Russia has condemned the decision by the UK government to boost its arsenal of nuclear weapons, saying the move would harm international stability. The UK will increase the cap on its nuclear warhead stockpile by more than 40 per cent, prime minister Boris Johnson revealed as part of his foreign and defence policy review on Tuesday.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-nuclear-weapons-uk-boris-johnson-b1818339.html
After many, many years of all the major powers around the world working on reducing nuclear warheads, just the 2 questions
1. Why ?
2. How are we going to pay for it given our current debt situation ?
Nurses Not Nukes !..... Nice distraction for Johnson though.
They have 6000, we have 200... hardly seems like this would even matter to them. There must be something we are missing here!
1. Why ?
2. How are we going to pay for it given our current debt situation ?
They have 6000, we have 200... hardly seems like this would even matter to them. There must be something we are missing here!
40 Nukes dropped on our little Island would mean we would simply cease to exist, we are no nuclear threat in any real way and increasing our warheads just guarantees that those 40 nukes will be dropped pretty quickly if things ever get messy.
the distraction seems to be working if everyone is talking about it.
more hopeful of the change of emphasis to enhanced science and industry contribution in defence strategy.
40 Nukes dropped on our little Island would mean we would simply cease to exist, we are no nuclear threat in any real way and increasing our warheads just guarantees that those 40 nukes will be dropped pretty quickly if things ever get messy.
Who’s talking about it apart from the L v R on here, Roman Kemps depression is a hotter topic on the BBC [emoji23]
I can confirm we had 16 of the beauties every time we went out.I’ve always thought we should just pretend we have loads of nukes. If we were ever in a situation where we would have to use them, there is not going to be many of us left to criticise the Government for lying about the amount we have.
It’s not only the bomber submarines that have them either. I can neither confirm or deny that I served on at least one ship that carried tactical nukes.
16 missiles with 3 warheads in each.Just prior to that a Vanguard/Dreadnaught Class SSBN would have launched upto 15 ICBM’s each with upto 4 warheads in retaliation, this alone means that we have stayed safe for the last 50 plus years, it’s called Deterrent.
I don't begin to understand this. Is it a case of renewing/changing/upgrading technology that happens to change the configuration/number of warheads or are we really expanding our capacity??
The SNP in PMQ's were banging on about it.