Not necessarily, look at Labour 1979 to 1983…Let’s be brutally honest, from today it only gets slowly better for the Tories, equally as of today it will slowly get worse for the Labour Party.
Not necessarily, look at Labour 1979 to 1983…Let’s be brutally honest, from today it only gets slowly better for the Tories, equally as of today it will slowly get worse for the Labour Party.
Really don't think they have the same quality plus, at the time, Blair was popular where people don't seem very keen on Starmer, his main positive is he's not Tory.Not necessarily, look at Labour 1979 to 1983…
Whilst yesterday Labour only increased its vote share by 1.6%.... yet gained 211 seats.. ( 95% increase)... as I said in the last two elections when seeing the disproportionate SNP votes Vs seats equation... something needs to change.... ( Not partisan observation)Interesting as a similar question was asked about Labour on that Friday in December 2019, 5 years is a long time in Politics and no one could have predicted last night all those years ago
That's probably the most sensible thing that I've ever seen you post.Let’s be brutally honest, from today it only gets slowly better for the Tories, equally as of today it will slowly get worse for the Labour Party.
VAT on private school fees, taxes more likely on savings (the promise not to tax 'working people'), giving votes to schoolchildren, no commitment not to tax the state pension, no plan to discourage illegal immigrants.the Labour Party did their best to appeal to the more right of centre voters, not those on the left.
Blair wasn’t Labour leader in 1979.Really don't think they have the same quality plus, at the time, Blair was popular where people don't seem very keen on Starmer, his main positive is he's not Tory.
Damn, I knew someone would get there before me.Is it down to the lake I fear?
They promised things that appealed to both sides, of course, but in the final days Starmer was saying “we’ll won’t rejoin the EU in my lifetime” and similar things designed to reassure voters in non-city-centre constituencies - not to fire up his core voters.VAT on private school fees, taxes more likely on savings (the promise not to tax 'working people'), giving votes to schoolchildren, no commitment not to tax the state pension, no plan to discourage illegal immigrants.
I don't think that was "appealing to the right of centre voters".
Except that:correct- and Labour lost a lot of votes both to the left and towards the right in 2019, having been caught between a rock and a hard place. A lot of parallels with last night really just on the other side of the spectrum
In response Labour had two options really, going with a fairly left leaning leader again like Rebecca Long-Bailey or moving to the centre with Starmer
Remain got the working class leavers and Labour already had the metropolitan remainers.The 2019 election was an outlier, in the sense that it was really a single issue election.
Everyone was sick of Brexit negotiations. Johnson came in hammering home "Get Brexit Done!"
Labour were busy dillydallying and infighting and didn't present any coherent vision.
The wishy washy stance on Brexit was what did for them, and why Starmer is still now so petrified to say that Brexit has gone badly. But to be fair to him, he has managed to secure the vote from both working class leave voters and metropolitan remainders and that's no mean feat.
I've been thinking exactly the opposite. . . .Let’s be brutally honest, from today it only gets slowly better for the Tories, equally as of today it will slowly get worse for the Labour Party.