Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Tory meltdown finally arrived [was: incoming]...







Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
37,340
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
Time for a new meltdown thread


My first conspiracy type theory of the month:

Dorries continues to delay resigning to fight Boris's corner. Eventually does so after the other two by-elections. Tories get dry humped in both. Sunak gets the blame for this from the Tory right. Boris is nominated as Tory candidate in Mad Nad's former seat.
 










Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
My first conspiracy type theory of the month:

Dorries continues to delay resigning to fight Boris's corner. Eventually does so after the other two by-elections. Tories get dry humped in both. Sunak gets the blame for this from the Tory right. Boris is nominated as Tory candidate in Mad Nad's former seat.
The 90 day suspension applies to any new seat he tries for.
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
This morning I told the 5 year old and 2 year old there was no screen time until after breakfast and they were ready for school etc.

I walked in to say breakfast was ready and found the wonderful childrens show Bluey was on via the iPlayer. The 5 year old, without hesitation said her little brother had reached up, grabbed the remote, turned the tv on, found I Player, typed in 'Bluey' and started the episode. When I questioned this she gradually diluted the tale, phasing her involvement in bit by bit. My intense interrogation (asked her why she kept lying) eventually saw the bottom lip begin to tremble.

After a talk, even she understood I was more upset by the fact she continually lied and tried to take me for a fool, rather than the initial act itself.

Yet, this man just couldn't get it.

I couldn't stand him, but if he'd just said up front that they'd had a gathering then I would have been a bit peeved but it would have gone.

But to just keep LYING over and over? taking everyone for idiots? No.
He’s been sacked from every job he’s had, for lying.
 






Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
No, she doesn’t. Not one. She’s just trying to smear the committee especially now they’ve been warned that calling it a kangaroo court is contempt of Parliament itself. (Ps she did yesterday)

 




beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,014




clapham_gull

Legacy Fan
Aug 20, 2003
25,876
By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
She doesn't have a point on anything. One of the worst (if not the worst) member of a front bench in living memory in a very competitive field.

This is the minister who before committees and interviews stated ->

1) Channels Four is in receipt of public money. It's commercially funded.
2) Channel Five was more successful after being privatised. Channel 5 has never been publicly owned.
3) Channel Four used actors (as opposed to real people) in a documentary she appeared in. Subsequent investigations by Channels Four and the production company proved the statement to be incorrect.

None of her statements above are true, not even opinion but she refuses to correct the record.

.. and whilst making a public and immediate resignation from her post, hasn't gone anywhere whilst she argues for her gong back.

She's straight out of the Johnson playbook.
 




MJsGhost

Oooh Matron, I'm an
NSC Patron
Jun 26, 2009
5,023
East
By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
But does she though? Leaving aside the massive hypocrisy of suggesting there might be 'gongs' in wait for those that do their masters' bidding, 3 of the 4 Tories are already in safe seats and 2 are already knights of the realm. What exactly does she think they are being lined up for?

It's just the ranting of a fan-girl stooge who is having a strop because she has found out that all those years of work defending the indefensible won't get the pay-off she was promised.

It's amazing how gullible people can be.
 




Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
17,770
Fiveways
She doesn't have a point on anything. One of the worst (if not the worst) member of a front bench in living memory in a very competitive field.

This is the minister who before committees and interviews stated ->

1) Channels Four is in receipt of public money. It's commercially funded.
2) Channel Five was more successful after being privatised. Channel 5 has never been publicly owned.
3) Channel Four used actors (as opposed to real people) in a documentary she appeared in. Subsequent investigations by Channels Four and the production company proved the statement to be incorrect.

None of her statements above are true, not even opinion but she refuses to correct the record.

.. and whilst making a public and immediate resignation from her post, hasn't gone anywhere whilst she argues for her gong back.

She's straight out of the Johnson playbook.
Yes, but when she's up against Failing Grayling and, my personal nadir, Gavin Williamson (as Education Secretary, of all things), that's some seriously stiff competition.
 




Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,103
Faversham
Did I read that the inquiries outcome was voted on unanimously by the committee? if so the attacks on Harriet Harman are vile, but not unexpected. And as for mad Nad's :oops:
Unanimous. Yes.

Stand by for more lies and defamation from the Johnson gang.
 






Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,103
Faversham


Nobby

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2007
2,892
By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
What the actual feck are you taking about?
By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
Which is what?

That she will try anything to get herself a Damehood - by any means - even if it means putting other MP's at potential physical risk?

She is a thick drunken nutjob who has somehow brown nosed her way into a position of power.

FFS Lenny
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here