I've always thought more of a large, brown Richard the Third.......I'm getting some Richard II vibes from the narcissistic wankpuffin.
I've always thought more of a large, brown Richard the Third.......I'm getting some Richard II vibes from the narcissistic wankpuffin.
Time for a new meltdown thread
Nadine Dorries says any MP who backs report 'fundamentally not a Conservative' and at risk of deselection
The 90 day suspension applies to any new seat he tries for.My first conspiracy type theory of the month:
Dorries continues to delay resigning to fight Boris's corner. Eventually does so after the other two by-elections. Tories get dry humped in both. Sunak gets the blame for this from the Tory right. Boris is nominated as Tory candidate in Mad Nad's former seat.
He’s been sacked from every job he’s had, for lying.This morning I told the 5 year old and 2 year old there was no screen time until after breakfast and they were ready for school etc.
I walked in to say breakfast was ready and found the wonderful childrens show Bluey was on via the iPlayer. The 5 year old, without hesitation said her little brother had reached up, grabbed the remote, turned the tv on, found I Player, typed in 'Bluey' and started the episode. When I questioned this she gradually diluted the tale, phasing her involvement in bit by bit. My intense interrogation (asked her why she kept lying) eventually saw the bottom lip begin to tremble.
After a talk, even she understood I was more upset by the fact she continually lied and tried to take me for a fool, rather than the initial act itself.
Yet, this man just couldn't get it.
I couldn't stand him, but if he'd just said up front that they'd had a gathering then I would have been a bit peeved but it would have gone.
But to just keep LYING over and over? taking everyone for idiots? No.
Time for a new meltdown thread
No, she doesn’t. Not one. She’s just trying to smear the committee especially now they’ve been warned that calling it a kangaroo court is contempt of Parliament itself. (Ps she did yesterday)By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
Does she bollocks. She’ll find herself on the naughty step for contempt with all the other pollocks.By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
only in that its implicit confession, what she was expecting for her support.By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
She doesn't have a point on anything. One of the worst (if not the worst) member of a front bench in living memory in a very competitive field.By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
But does she though? Leaving aside the massive hypocrisy of suggesting there might be 'gongs' in wait for those that do their masters' bidding, 3 of the 4 Tories are already in safe seats and 2 are already knights of the realm. What exactly does she think they are being lined up for?By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
Yes, but when she's up against Failing Grayling and, my personal nadir, Gavin Williamson (as Education Secretary, of all things), that's some seriously stiff competition.She doesn't have a point on anything. One of the worst (if not the worst) member of a front bench in living memory in a very competitive field.
This is the minister who before committees and interviews stated ->
1) Channels Four is in receipt of public money. It's commercially funded.
2) Channel Five was more successful after being privatised. Channel 5 has never been publicly owned.
3) Channel Four used actors (as opposed to real people) in a documentary she appeared in. Subsequent investigations by Channels Four and the production company proved the statement to be incorrect.
None of her statements above are true, not even opinion but she refuses to correct the record.
.. and whilst making a public and immediate resignation from her post, hasn't gone anywhere whilst she argues for her gong back.
She's straight out of the Johnson playbook.
The committee might have voted unanimously but, as chair of the committee, Harriet Harman doesn't have a vote (unless it's in the balance).Did I read that the inquiries outcome was voted on unanimously by the committee? if so the attacks on Harriet Harman are vile, but not unexpected. And as for mad Nad's
Unanimous. Yes.Did I read that the inquiries outcome was voted on unanimously by the committee? if so the attacks on Harriet Harman are vile, but not unexpected. And as for mad Nad's
Isn't that Sir Gavin Williamson?Yes, but when she's up against Failing Grayling and, my personal nadir, Gavin Williamson (as Education Secretary, of all things), that's some seriously stiff competition.
What the actual feck are you taking about?By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
Which is what?By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.