Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Tory meltdown finally arrived [was: incoming]...







chickens

Have you considered masterly inactivity?
NSC Patron
Oct 12, 2022
2,684
The DUP and ERG have rejected Sunaks deal on the NI issue.

The civil war will rumble on!

At this rate, Labour will be shaping the new agreement after the next general election. The ERG have been foolish here, their time of influence is, I very much suspect, drawing to a close.
 


Reddleman

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
2,170
I am absolutely sick to death of the ERG and their ‘influence’ on British politics. If Sunak had anything about him he would impose a three line whip and anyone who voted against the bill loses the whip. The bill would still pass with Labour support and finally they could lance the boil. He won’t though.
 


Rdodge30

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2022
591
At this rate, Labour will be shaping the new agreement after the next general election. The ERG have been foolish here, their time of influence is, I very much suspect, drawing to a close.
Ridiculous sabotage from the ERG

However Labour will bring with them their own equivalent with the Socialist Campaign Group within their parliamentary party

And so it goes and so it goes
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
I misled you, but I did it in good faith. For once, Boris is telling the truth.

In his mind, "in good faith" will mean "honesty or sincerity of intention".

Effectively, he is saying "I misled you, and that was my honest and sincere intention".
Ignorance is no defence of the law.

Mistake or ignorance of law. Ignorance or mistake of law is no defence to a criminal charge; mens rea does not involve knowledge on the part of a defendant that his acts or omissions were against the law and constituted a crime1.
 




WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,701
I am absolutely sick to death of the ERG and their ‘influence’ on British politics. If Sunak had anything about him he would impose a three line whip and anyone who voted against the bill loses the whip. The bill would still pass with Labour support and finally they could lance the boil. He won’t though.
I agree the bill will pass anyway and about the ERG's ongoing idiocy, but what boil will replacing Johnson's 'Northern Ireland Protocol' with May's 'Northern Ireland backstop', now rebranded Sunak's 'Windsor Framework' lance exactly ? :shrug:
 


MJsGhost

Oooh Matron, I'm an
NSC Patron
Jun 26, 2009
5,009
East
Ignorance is no defence of the law.

Mistake or ignorance of law. Ignorance or mistake of law is no defence to a criminal charge; mens rea does not involve knowledge on the part of a defendant that his acts or omissions were against the law and constituted a crime1.
Is this not about the parliamentary code of conduct rather than the law?

He's trying to say he didn't intentionally mislead the House, even though the investigation suggests that what he said was wrong.

Any sane person would look at the circumstances and decide that he knew enough AT THE TIME to know that the parties were against the rules and therefore he deliberately misled the House with his statements about them, but he has spent a sh|t-tonne of taxpayer's money on Lord Pannick to try and wheedle out on a technicality again.

Someone just needs to put the scruffy c**t in the bin, then in the sea, then on a slowboat to Rwanda
 


rippleman

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2011
4,977
Is this not about the parliamentary code of conduct rather than the law?

He's trying to say he didn't intentionally mislead the House, even though the investigation suggests that what he said was wrong.

Any sane person would look at the circumstances and decide that he knew enough AT THE TIME to know that the parties were against the rules and therefore he deliberately misled the House with his statements about them, but he has spent a sh|t-tonne of taxpayer's money on Lord Pannick to try and wheedle out on a technicality again.

Someone just needs to put the scruffy c**t in the bin, then in the sea, then on a slowboat to Rwanda
Is that before or after he has been ploughed into The Clamp's ditch?
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Is this not about the parliamentary code of conduct rather than the law?

He's trying to say he didn't intentionally mislead the House, even though the investigation suggests that what he said was wrong.

Any sane person would look at the circumstances and decide that he knew enough AT THE TIME to know that the parties were against the rules and therefore he deliberately misled the House with his statements about them, but he has spent a sh|t-tonne of taxpayer's money on Lord Pannick to try and wheedle out on a technicality again.

Someone just needs to put the scruffy c**t in the bin, then in the sea, then on a slowboat to Rwanda
He's saying nobody told him it was wrong, or that is the way I have read it.
 










Hotchilidog

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2009
9,115
His defence is, yes I misled parliament but I had no idea I was doing it. So basically I did it, but not my fault guv. Absolutely risible.

Johnson is a serial liar in both his personal and professional life, there is no reason to believe he has ever done anything in good faith.

At the time of the parties people could not meet, many were isolated dealing with trauma of losing loved ones to the pandemic. This pathetic whining from this self-serving prat is a grave insult to all those abiding by the rules throughout the crisis. How anyone thought this chancer was ever suitable to run this country is beyond me.
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,701
Ridiculous sabotage from the ERG

However Labour will bring with them their own equivalent with the Socialist Campaign Group within their parliamentary party

And so it goes and so it goes
A lot of people use 'They're all the same' when they've made a crap decision and don't want to admit it. By claiming 'They're all the same' it somehow justifies their crap decision, a bit like saying 'All Chinese food is crap' because they chose a crap Chinese restaurant.

But I'm sure that isn't the case here :wink:
 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,494
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Johnson's claims he didn't understand the law might have more impact if he wasn't literally on TV every night telling us what the law was at the time.
 


Rdodge30

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2022
591
A lot of people use 'They're all the same' when they've made a crap decision and don't want to admit it. By claiming 'They're all the same' it somehow justifies their crap decision, a bit like saying 'All Chinese food is crap' because they chose a crap Chinese restaurant.

But I'm sure that isn't the case here :wink:
There are also people who consider any kind of comparison between governments to be whataboutery, thereby removing any option for comparison, as suits their narrative.

But I’m sure that isn’t the case here either
 








AlbionBro

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2020
1,400
Marilyn Monroe once said “I’m not offended by all the dumb blonde jokes because I know I’m not dumb… and I also know that I’m not blonde.”
Unfortunately Johnson is blonde.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here