Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Her Majesty doesn’t want it.
It is important to note that this is a group of folks who, when polled, the majority were happy for the economy of this country to go to the dogs if it meant leaving the EU.
2019 YouGOV
View attachment 150138
It doesn't matter how rational Sunak appears compared to fantasy Lizz, he's toast and he's the wrong colour for a lot of the UKIP intake that infiltrated the membership in recent years. I'm not saying all the members are racist but there are enough
If I was Sunak, try for a cabinet position for agreeing to stand down or use his green card, get back to Santa Monica and come back when the skip fire has run its course, things won't end well
not everything is constantly about race. White people obsess over this way more than those that are effected by race issues the most.
He's pretty much 2nd in command for the country. Difficult to play a race bias when in that position.
As for Truss , likened to thatcher far to often for my liking. Could be another disaster for sure
I'm not saying all the members are racist but there are enough
And the lunacy continues
[Tweet]1550081224890351617[/Tweet]
And the lunacy continues
[Tweet]1550081224890351617[/Tweet]
you think european politicans and elections are all carebear love between parties? sure, once they select their members (from the party list, no more voting out people disliked) they might frame around common ground for a short while, discarding many principled positions (see Liberals student loans). that might be centrist, until it isnt and left or right coalitions come in (Italy, Poland). reminder that in 2015 PR would have delivered 12% UKIP MPs, likely Farage and friends in cabinet as part of a coalition.
im certainly coming around to the idea of some alternative from of voting, the motivations of many seems an expectation their preference will win as a result. thats not a sound, honest basis for change.
Remember the faux outrage at P&O's actions?
The modern Conservative party is entirely in the pocket of international capital. It cloaks itself in meaningless patrioitic gestures, but cares not a jot for Britain and British people. It will side with capital on every issue, because it is, to all intents and purposes, owned by it.
Actual political engagement, rather than just reactive responses to deliberate jabs to the limbic system, has been brought to such tiny levels among the general population by the unprecedented levels of venality that they can dismantle everything without causing outrage, because we all simply expect it of them. To paraphrase 'The Usual Suspects' - 'The greatest trick that the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that it just didn't care whether or not he existed.'
Remember the faux outrage at P&O's actions?
The modern Conservative party is entirely in the pocket of international capital. It cloaks itself in meaningless patrioitic gestures, but cares not a jot for Britain and British people. It will side with capital on every issue, because it is, to all intents and purposes, owned by it.
Actual political engagement, rather than just reactive responses to deliberate jabs to the limbic system, has been brought to such tiny levels among the general population by the unprecedented levels of venality that they can dismantle everything without causing outrage, because we all simply expect it of them. To paraphrase 'The Usual Suspects' - 'The greatest trick that the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that it just didn't care whether or not he existed.'
I don't have any regrets, but I was tempted and should have left the country in the late 90's . . . Several work opportunities and some others. . . then I met Mrs Zef. Aus is an option, but frankly no better than here!
Remember the faux outrage at P&O's actions?
The modern Conservative party is entirely in the pocket of international capital. It cloaks itself in meaningless patrioitic gestures, but cares not a jot for Britain and British people. It will side with capital on every issue, because it is, to all intents and purposes, owned by it.
Actual political engagement, rather than just reactive responses to deliberate jabs to the limbic system, has been brought to such tiny levels among the general population by the unprecedented levels of venality that they can dismantle everything without causing outrage, because we all simply expect it of them. To paraphrase 'The Usual Suspects' - 'The greatest trick that the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that it just didn't care whether or not he existed.'
As I noted yesterday our system gives a disproportionately large number of seats (relative to votes) to labour and tories, and a disproportionately small number of seats to the liberals and greens. That, to me, is the only things that is 'unfair'. However, another way of looking at it is like this:
For 15 years, Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Murray were miles better than any of the other male tennis players. That said, in terms of major tournaments won, the first three have far far more than Murray. Far more than the degree of difference in ability would predict. However, the thing is, if you keep finishing second or third, you can't expect to be given trophies.
Thus the liberals regularly finish second in constituencies, second behind labour in some, second behind tories in others. Second. Not first. Like Murray.
So who says it's unfair that the number of seats they get is unfairly low compared with their support?
Frankly, the current tories excepted, the libereals have always looked far less 'competent' than either labour or tory in terms of leadership and judgement. Just when the liberals were getting up a head of steam 15 or so years ago they decided to **** it all up by devoting half their conference to spotty yoof pleading for the legaization of cannabis. Not a serious party. Likewise the greens. Come on! And for monoculture obsessives like UKIP.....
No our FPTP system keeps the Murray's of this world out of the pantheon. Good. I don't care. If a party really wants to win it needs to get properly serious and hold the attention of the public. Ideally this can be done by having grown up policies, but alas that went out of the window when Brexit loomed.....and labour supporters backed Johnson to get Brexit done.....
Hopefully the lunacy will now subside. But I am pretty sure there would be a greater chance of electing more nut job governments (coalitions of fools) with a change to our system away from FPTP.
My final point on the issue is this. When we were in the EU we knew what it was like to be in the EU. The impertaive to leave was the 'grass is greener' syndrome. But this was a step into the unknown, fingers crossed. Take a look at Dover this morning.....chucking out FPTP for a new system designed to give a different government from the usual labour or tory would be an equally risky leap into the dark. I am not in favour of any more risk taking. Not for now, anyway. Stability would be nice....
The actual quote is "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist."
Yes, but you're meant to ending their Free Movement, not ours.