I think that's a big part of our current problem. Why is one of our strikers in the team because he defends well??
We all agree, I believe, that our back four is one of the best in the division and we have two or three good defensive midfielders, so why do we also need to rely on the defensive qualities of a striker?
If our strikers were given clear instructions that their roles were to score goals, and if we left the defending to our defenders, maybe, just maybe, the team would be able to entertain the fans by putting the ball in the net more than once in a game.
Just a thought.
So true ... I'm sure the critics will say the game is more technical than that but a lot of the good sides I've seen in this league tend not to over complicate. Like you, I'd rather hear our strikers were better at scoring goals than defending them