Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Torbjørn Agdestein



Rugrat

Well-known member
Mar 13, 2011
10,224
Seaford
I think that's a big part of our current problem. Why is one of our strikers in the team because he defends well??

We all agree, I believe, that our back four is one of the best in the division and we have two or three good defensive midfielders, so why do we also need to rely on the defensive qualities of a striker?

If our strikers were given clear instructions that their roles were to score goals, and if we left the defending to our defenders, maybe, just maybe, the team would be able to entertain the fans by putting the ball in the net more than once in a game.

Just a thought.

So true ... I'm sure the critics will say the game is more technical than that but a lot of the good sides I've seen in this league tend not to over complicate. Like you, I'd rather hear our strikers were better at scoring goals than defending them
 




dejavuatbtn

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2010
7,581
Henfield
This goes back to the 4141 V 442 debate - whilst I think that TA is more direct and likes to run at people, I would prefer us to play 442, with Barnes and CMS up front with one winger who could be replaced by another when fatigue sets in. This leaves three central players, which shoud be enough to compete in midfield. It will be interesting when Bridcutt gets suspended, but I guess he will play another defensive midfielder in his place, although one who may be more comfortable going forward.
 


Timbo

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
4,322
Hassocks
We seem to be intent on playing every striker we have at left midfield. Makes no sense. Seen a couple of development games lately and seen Toby, Barker and Oatway all looking lost out there.
 


mune ni kamome

Well-known member
Jun 5, 2011
2,220
Worthing
I think that's a big part of our current problem. Why is one of our strikers in the team because he defends well??

We all agree, I believe, that our back four is one of the best in the division and we have two or three good defensive midfielders, so why do we also need to rely on the defensive qualities of a striker?

If our strikers were given clear instructions that their roles were to score goals, and if we left the defending to our defenders, maybe, just maybe, the team would be able to entertain the fans by putting the ball in the net more than once in a game.

Just a thought.

This sort of talk is unacceptable. You can't go around telling uncomfortable truths, using common sense and reasoned arguments. Seriously, wouldn't it be nice for the midfield players to look up and see wingers and attackers running into space for a defence splitting pass instead of passing to someone facing them who has no choice but to pass it straight back again.
 


I think that's a big part of our current problem. Why is one of our strikers in the team because he defends well??

We all agree, I believe, that our back four is one of the best in the division and we have two or three good defensive midfielders, so why do we also need to rely on the defensive qualities of a striker?

If our strikers were given clear instructions that their roles were to score goals, and if we left the defending to our defenders, maybe, just maybe, the team would be able to entertain the fans by putting the ball in the net more than once in a game.

Just a thought.

I`m afraid you couldn`t be more wrong. Klinsmann, Lineker, Shearer and even Owen in his prime, they certainly didn`t build their reputations by the goals they scored. It was because of their magnificent defending capabilities. Honestly, don`t you people know anything about football!
 




mune ni kamome

Well-known member
Jun 5, 2011
2,220
Worthing
There was no finer sight than to see Fred Binney chasing back to make a goal line clearance then hurtling upfield to get on the end of a cross and poking it into the back of the net.
 








element

Fear [is] the key.....
Jan 28, 2009
1,887
Local
GP sees them all in training, day in day out, and I would think if he saw some potential for someone to score A goal, he'd pop them in the starting line-up pronto. I would deduce from this that he hasn't seen any potential from any of the DV squad ???
 


Surf's Up

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2011
10,443
Here
I'm not sure Gus trusts development squad players enough to give any of them a go at the first team until they've proven themselves in a lower league.
 


Napper

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
24,466
Sussex
I'm not sure Gus trusts development squad players enough to give any of them a go at the first team until they've proven themselves in a lower league.

JFC disproves this though

Got a chance grabbed it then sodded off to L2

Torb will be gone end of the season, if he cant figure now I cant ever see it happening.
 






Jul 14, 2012
36
This thread is pathetic. Systematic of the idiots posting on this forum these days. Is this really the best you people can come up? Some inane chatter about some untalented Norweigan slogger? Seriously, the time will come again when there are proper players at this football club, not bog standard sloggers like this nobody. He'll be released, eventually, have been given a charmed life with no hassle.
 


Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
72,413
This thread is pathetic. Systematic of the idiots posting on this forum these days. Is this really the best you people can come up? Some inane chatter about some untalented Norweigan slogger? Seriously, the time will come again when there are proper players at this football club, not bog standard sloggers like this nobody. He'll be released, eventually, have been given a charmed life with no hassle.

:thumbsup:

It is a bit pathetic, has to be said. Putting him in the 'Development Squad' at the age of 21 is surely the modern day Albion equivalent of labelling him 'one for the future'. Which is manager-speak for 'OK, I bought a dud, hey, win some lose some, we'll quietly tuck him away out of sight and get rid when we think least people will notice'. Sorry, but that's how it is.
 




Djmiles

Barndoor Holroyd
Dec 1, 2005
12,064
Kitchener, Canada
Toby Toby Toby:bowdown:

My favourite Albion player by a long distance, ever since he made a comment about how a Paint Pot game (Northampton I think?), was the biggest crowd he'd ever seen.

He's going to be as good as Messi, just you wait.
 


Bognor Seagull

Active member
Dec 2, 2011
890
Marginally better than Holroyd but will never make the grade, other than in a lower league 2 side.

Poyet is useless when it comes to forwards. Needs to go.
 


Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,787
GOSBTS
Marginally better than Holroyd but will never make the grade, other than in a lower league 2 side.

Poyet is useless when it comes to forwards. Needs to go.

:ffsparr:
 


S'hampton Seagull

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2003
6,947
Southampton
He's looked promising on the rare 1st team apps he's had, I thought Poyet may have given him more of a chance by now.
 




Zebedee

Anyone seen Florence?
Jul 8, 2003
8,053
Hangleton
GP sees them all in training, day in day out, and I would think if he saw some potential for someone to score A goal, he'd pop them in the starting line-up pronto. I would deduce from this that he hasn't seen any potential from any of the DV squad ???

You'd actually trust Gus to spot a decent striker? His record on signing/spotting attacking players is not very good.
 


Conkers

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2006
4,574
Haywards Heath
Toby has shown more than Holroyd ever did.
He will come good, he just oozes Norweigan flair.

I <3 Toby
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here