- Thread starter
- #21
OK I can accept you definition of murder at a stretch as the argument for "after birth " is as spurious as arguments for slavery in the 1700s "Well its always been that way etc etc".
But wouldn't preventing a woman whos life was in danger from terminating a life be also a deliberate act of murder?
Why do you fall back on hocus pocus scripture that hates women? Mind you the modern view hates men instead. Why not support the Equal right to choose rather than womens privelege? It would reduce the number of "murders" and be more egalirarian, you could make amendments for quirks like the example I gave.
Medicine has advanced on a massive scale since your Biblical book of fairy tales was written, so why not take a more measured approach than an absolutist stance based on what someone thought over 2000 odd years ago.
Because the unborn baby has no say/control in what happens to him/her.
And it is very rare that a womans life is in danger when giving birth in this day and age.