dougdeep
New member
Don't speed and you don't have to be worried. You'll also save yourself some money and petrol, which would be pretty handy at the moment, no?
Smart arse. Everyone speeds at some time. It's poor driving that kills.
Don't speed and you don't have to be worried. You'll also save yourself some money and petrol, which would be pretty handy at the moment, no?
But there is a growing lobby in Germany to introduce a 120km limit on the Autobahns: Pro Tempolimit (Tempolimit - Klimaschutz - Klimawandel
for those who read German) is an is an alliance “for road safety and climate protection” between environmental groups, the VCD (the German equivalent of the AA), and the Federal police. Apart from cutting CO2 emisisions, they also claim that a 120km limit would save "hundreds" of lives a year, which does suggest not everyone there agrees that driving at ludicrous speed is just as safe as driving sensibly.
Of course, as you point out, the main people who are currently poo-pooing their claims are BMW, Audi and Mercedes...
I've see some the aftermath of some horrendous accidents on the German Autobahns, which I can only put down to excessive speed I think that the "Auffahrunfall" ("driving-into-the-back-of-someone-accident") is far more common there than here - hardly surprising since you usually only get two lanes in each direction outside the urban areas. One thing where they do score over us though is that drivers tend to use their headlights on the autobahn even in bright conditions (it's now mandatory at all times on all roads in Austria) - at least you get some warning of someone coming up behind you at 200 km/hour! I drove to and from Heathrow on Monday morning in appalling conditions and was amazed at the number of people driving without lights.
The headlights are another example of simple measures that the authorities could introduce to help road safety that will be far more effective than persecuting those who drive a couple of mph over the speed limit.
If you consider how many journeys there are in this country in which speeding occurs, compared to the number of accidents, the figures will be tiny, but it is used by the authorities as it is easy to set up cameras, (taking away police patrols) compared with enforcing the law for other, more dangerous bad habits drivers have developed.
I agree. Driving in the rain and gloom without lights is tantamount to reckless driving in my view, and a well publicised campaign against it could have a beneficial effect on accident rates. Drivers hogging the middle lane at 60 MPH should also be targeted. Inexecusible though it is, I can sometimes see why others are tempted to undertake.
SLIGHTLY CHEAPER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There and back in car with days out less than £100 saving £250 straight away!!
do you even know why there are limits on motorways because there never used to be
Hopefully these camera's will catch you Mr Steward. Your attitude on this subject stinks man.
The reasons speed limits were implemented was due to AC using the M1 as a test track at night !!, speed limits were implemented around 1963-1964
Until you have been in a car with me i suggest you reserve judgement!!!
Yep still amazes me how few people actually know that.
Why?