BensGrandad
New member
deleted sorry didnt see the other thread about Southampton game.
Not sure he had a lot of choice after he arrived with the injuries, shot confidence and precarious league position - one (and only I think) objective was to stay up, which he did a bit easier than I expected in the end. Big test this season though.
I agree that confidence was an issue, but I don't think he helped the cause there. In taking a side that had showed they were good enough to play really well against Leeds and Ipswich, and setting them up at places like Rotherham and Wigan to sit back and try not to lose, was pretty much telling them that they WERE shit. He should have been telling them they were great, and to go and attack those teams.
All will pan out over the next couple of months. Recruitment is the key of course. Good players win football matches. Winning teams grow. It's really that simple.
I agree that confidence was an issue, but I don't think he helped the cause there. In taking a side that had showed they were good enough to play really well against Leeds and Ipswich, and setting them up at places like Rotherham and Wigan to sit back and try not to lose, was pretty much telling them that they WERE shit. He should have been telling them they were great, and to go and attack those teams.
All will pan out over the next couple of months. Recruitment is the key of course. Good players win football matches. Winning teams grow. It's really that simple.
They were both 6 pointers and we had to try to avoid defeat. Luckily things went our way.
We lost both games BG.
Seems those purporting to have an inside track are now suggesting that rather than "2 early this week" it is now "2 by the Crawley game"
I don't even know when that is but it ain't imminent
Hughton actually inherited a team that was going through an upturn, courtesy of Nathan. His first month or two was encouraging; it was what followed that which wasn't. Here, I'm not just referring to the results, but also the paucity of goals at either end but especially ours (how many did we manage in the last ten games?), the number of decent chances created, and the number of our players that made it into the opposition penalty area and, at times, half of the pitch. So it seems as though Hughton's brief spell here replicates both his attacking days at Birmingham and Newcastle, and negative borefests of Norwich.
What will happen next season?
Number of 'embargoed until X:00pm' emails received today: none.
Number of 'embargoed until X:00pm' emails received today: none.
Any saying 'embargoed until X.30pm'?Number of 'embargoed until X:00pm' emails received today: none.
Number of 'embargoed until X:00pm' emails received today: none.
Heard a rumour we've enquired about Daniel Pudil as a possible wide man, although we've yet to officially table a bid.
Heard a rumour we've enquired about Daniel Pudil as a possible wide man, although we've yet to officially table a bid.
Anyone who seriously judges Hughton on what happened the last couple of months of last season, when his already limited attacking options were affected by injuries to March and Baldock, is being very unfair. There were good games in the first few months e.g. Ipswich and Leeds but he had seriously poor resources and being defensive was probably the best approach.
To be honest, your constant moaning about Hughton suggests to me that you'd be really happy if he failed. Why not give him a chance rather than slagging him off every time you can (especially as usually you're quite a sensible poster on here and not one of the reactionary ones).