Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

The Second Investec Ashes Test, England v Australia, Lords







hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,763
Chandlers Ford
The QUEEN isn't very LUCKY, is she? Any chance of her toddling off back to Buck House soonish?
 




Oct 25, 2003
23,964
no wonder Her Majesty has stormed off after this shambles

if these were the good old days then Cook and that child that they've let play with adults would be thrown in the tower of london and tried for TREASON
 






hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,763
Chandlers Ford
no wonder Her Majesty has stormed off after this shambles

if these were the good old days then Cook and that child that they've let play with adults would be thrown in the tower of london and tried for TREASON

Don't Harris and Pattinson have three English parents between them? If there's any hangings for TREASON going on, they've got to be first in line...
 


The discrepancy in the system is the Trott and Root LBW decisions. Trott was given not out on the field, but that was overturned on DRS when for most people the front view showed a nick off the bat. No side hotspot available, and so there is absolutely no way the 3rd umpire could be in a position to overturn the on field decision.

For Root, given out, the replays suggested bat and pad at the sametime, maybe pad marginally first, so sticks with the on field decision correctly.

The Agar decision was just a poor one, as there is being certain and being certain, from pretty much every angle it looked out, I don't think anyone could work out where the 3rd umpires doubt came from.

But the Trott one was just like the Agar one, only MUCH WORSE. It was a f*** up from the third umpire, nothing more, nothing less. The system (as applied to Root) is correct, it's the application that's fallible.
 








Oct 25, 2003
23,964
Don't Harris and Pattinson have three English parents between them? If there's any hangings for TREASON going on, they've got to be first in line...

well as far as i'm concerned, Australia is still the property of QE2 and these two teams are simply putting on an exhibition of cricket between england and england as australia are still under british RULE...the fact that an england captain can disrespect our leader by putting on that disgrace of a performance is disgusting....should be a hanging offence imo
 


Barrel of Fun

Abort, retry, fail
no wonder Her Majesty has stormed off after this shambles

if these were the good old days then Cook and that child that they've let play with adults would be thrown in the tower of london and tried for TREASON

I hope she gave her ticket away to a lurker outside the ground.
 








hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,763
Chandlers Ford
What are you on about? His AVERAGE is 50. It doesn't take a lot of working out that to get an average of 50, he will be getting a lot of scores of 50 or more to balance the low scores which happen!!!!

Pietersen often DOES let himself down though, and I think over-confidence often comes into it. Take his dismissal today - ball did nothing much - KP stood there and thought "I'll just knock this down the pitch". And he would have too, in 5 or 6 overs time, when he'd got himself in properly - like he DID in the second innings at Trent Bridge. Often guilty of going too hard, too soon, without putting the hard work in first.
 




keaton

Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
Nov 18, 2004
9,972
Going round in circles now. That's not true of the Agar incident at all. He was NOT given 'not out' on the field.

Ish. He wasn't given Out, therefor it had to be porved he was Out. It's not that you're supposed to give the benefit of the doubt to the batsmen, it's that you can only give what you can see. The batsment 'natural' state is Not Out, something has to happen to make him 'Out' so without evidence of that he remains Not Out
 


spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
The bounce off this pitch will probably not last. I know it's an established habit to bat first, but on modern pitches that don't deteriorate that badly to the last day, it's worth getting the best of the pitch on the first morning. Again, I'd have fancied bowling at them, put the pressure on. Now we're back foot from the off once more...

At Lord's there's definately an argument for this. In recent years, there's always been plenty in it for the bowlers in the first session. The pitch tends to get quicker on days 2&3 before flattening out on days 4&5. It's a tough place to set a score to chase on as the pitch loses pace and it rarely turns a great deal.

It's a brave decision though, insert the opposition & have the opposition 350-1 at the end of the first day appears to be a far bigger captaincy "crime" than getting skittled.
 


spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
So who are the people moaning about England's top order bringing in then?

The next cabs off the rank are Compton, Taylor, Morgan & Bopara I reckon. I don't see any of those guys making this team better.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,196
Goldstone
The discrepancy in the system is the Trott and Root LBW decisions. Trott was given not out on the field, but that was overturned on DRS when for most people the front view showed a nick off the bat. No side hotspot available, and so there is absolutely no way the 3rd umpire could be in a position to overturn the on field decision.

For Root, given out, the replays suggested bat and pad at the sametime, maybe pad marginally first, so sticks with the on field decision correctly.

The Agar decision was just a poor one, as there is being certain and being certain, from pretty much every angle it looked out, I don't think anyone could work out where the 3rd umpires doubt came from.
To be honest I agree with all that (the Trott decision was just bad). I don't think there's a lack of clarity with the rules, just the odd bad decision.
 




Basil Fawlty

Don't Mention The War
So who are the people moaning about England's top order bringing in then?

The next cabs off the rank are Compton, Taylor, Morgan & Bopara I reckon. I don't see any of those guys making this team better.

Antony Stokes of Durham, you can add into the mix for our top order. But he is to inconsistent for this format. But still has great potential though.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here