Pietersen, still not convinced about this South African.
The QUEEN isn't very LUCKY, is she? Any chance of her toddling off back to Buck House soonish?
no wonder Her Majesty has stormed off after this shambles
if these were the good old days then Cook and that child that they've let play with adults would be thrown in the tower of london and tried for TREASON
The discrepancy in the system is the Trott and Root LBW decisions. Trott was given not out on the field, but that was overturned on DRS when for most people the front view showed a nick off the bat. No side hotspot available, and so there is absolutely no way the 3rd umpire could be in a position to overturn the on field decision.
For Root, given out, the replays suggested bat and pad at the sametime, maybe pad marginally first, so sticks with the on field decision correctly.
The Agar decision was just a poor one, as there is being certain and being certain, from pretty much every angle it looked out, I don't think anyone could work out where the 3rd umpires doubt came from.
Don't Harris and Pattinson have three English parents between them? If there's any hangings for TREASON going on, they've got to be first in line...
Don't Harris and Pattinson have three English parents between them? If there's any hangings for TREASON going on, they've got to be first in line...
no wonder Her Majesty has stormed off after this shambles
if these were the good old days then Cook and that child that they've let play with adults would be thrown in the tower of london and tried for TREASON
He's scored 7000 Test runs at an average of 50. He'll be gutted to hear that.
Yep no doubting his figures, but he ought to be getting into the eighties more times than he does.
What are you on about? His AVERAGE is 50. It doesn't take a lot of working out that to get an average of 50, he will be getting a lot of scores of 50 or more to balance the low scores which happen!!!!
Going round in circles now. That's not true of the Agar incident at all. He was NOT given 'not out' on the field.
The bounce off this pitch will probably not last. I know it's an established habit to bat first, but on modern pitches that don't deteriorate that badly to the last day, it's worth getting the best of the pitch on the first morning. Again, I'd have fancied bowling at them, put the pressure on. Now we're back foot from the off once more...
To be honest I agree with all that (the Trott decision was just bad). I don't think there's a lack of clarity with the rules, just the odd bad decision.The discrepancy in the system is the Trott and Root LBW decisions. Trott was given not out on the field, but that was overturned on DRS when for most people the front view showed a nick off the bat. No side hotspot available, and so there is absolutely no way the 3rd umpire could be in a position to overturn the on field decision.
For Root, given out, the replays suggested bat and pad at the sametime, maybe pad marginally first, so sticks with the on field decision correctly.
The Agar decision was just a poor one, as there is being certain and being certain, from pretty much every angle it looked out, I don't think anyone could work out where the 3rd umpires doubt came from.
So who are the people moaning about England's top order bringing in then?
The next cabs off the rank are Compton, Taylor, Morgan & Bopara I reckon. I don't see any of those guys making this team better.
Antony Stokes of Durham, you can add into the mix for our top order. But he is to inconsistent for this format. But still has great potential though.