just out of interest , how many goals would he get up front in league 1, bearing in mind he got 9(?) in a struggling team at a higher level. Hyperthetical but I'd predict 11
The bloke has been playing at a higher level since he left here and you don't rate him ? As for looking back would you say that if we bid for BZ? Just because he's been here before does not make him a lesser player.
what you on about ? haven't ever said don't rate him. Virgs was quality when he was here , I love the bloke
I have no problem with us signing Adam Virgo (he's a very good player), and the fact he's been here before isn't an issue as he's only 25 and his prime is yet to come. What baffles me is where he's going to play, as the two positions you could describe him as 'natural' in are right-back and centre-half, which are possibly the only two positions on the pitch we currently have enough cover for. I think he'd be a good signing, but in reality an unnecessary one. Butters has gone, but he's been replaced by Hawkins, so where is Virgo meant to fit into things? We may well be selling Elphick/Lynch, but I just hope Micky hasn't decided making Lynch the permanent left-back (and not signing a new one) is the answer.
Why do people keep banging on about selling Lynch or Elphick? They will be with us at the start of the season and possibly longer.
Hmmmm, I wouldn't bank on that. If Virgo does sign we'll effectively have 5 centre-backs. If big money comes in then I think either Lynch or Elphick will be on their way.
More than happy to have Virgs back, though, in actual fact, I reckon he could do a job up front in this league.
Nothing like contradicting yourself, aye?
Contradicting myself? Talking out of your arse
I'm not saying we're going to sell them. I said it would be a possible explanation for signing Virgo. Presuming there are no departures, I just can't see where Virgo's going to get games.
I have no problem with us signing Adam Virgo (he's a very good player), and the fact he's been here before isn't an issue as he's only 25 and his prime is yet to come. What baffles me is where he's going to play, as the two positions you could describe him as 'natural' in are right-back and centre-half, which are possibly the only two positions on the pitch we currently have enough cover for. I think he'd be a good signing, but in reality an unnecessary one. Butters has gone, but he's been replaced by Hawkins, so where is Virgo meant to fit into things? We may well be selling Elphick/Lynch, but I just hope Micky hasn't decided making Lynch the permanent left-back (and not signing a new one) is the answer.
Strongly disgree, irrespective of whether the story is true or not.
Just because he has played for us before should NEVER be a reason to preclude us from signing him. It's whether he's any good that's the issue. And we all know he is.
Virgo is on of those utility players that Adams is after.We have our main strikers but after that the rest is shit.Not sure about Gargan as he is a rookie.Virgo would be my third striker.Having a strong subs bench is the key to success.We haven't had that luxury for ages.